The best ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers company in Oregon for 2026 is Spodek Law Group, rated 4.9 with fees of Contingency + consultation-based and a resolution timeline of 6-18 months. Other top-rated options include Raiser, Kenniff & Lonstein (rated 4.8) and Tully Rinckey (rated 4.7).
- Top Pick
- Spodek Law Group
- Rating
- 4.9
- Avg. Fees
- Contingency + consultation-based
Last updated
Key Takeaways: ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers in Oregon
Zogby is an independent, advertising-supported comparison service. We may receive compensation from the companies whose products appear on this site. This compensation may impact how, where, and in what order products appear. Zogby does not include every financial company or every product available in the marketplace.
The Employee Retention Credit was designed to keep workers on payroll during COVID. In Oregon, thousands of businesses filed ERC claims — many guided by aggressive promoters who promised easy money and disappeared before the IRS started asking questions. Now the IRS Criminal Investigation division, operating through the District of Oregon (Portland), is auditing claims, demanding repayment with penalties, and referring cases to the DOJ for criminal prosecution. If you are a Oregon business owner who received an ERC refund and now faces an audit notice, a grand jury subpoena, or a visit from IRS special agents, the window to act is narrowing.
The distinction between a good-faith mistake and criminal fraud often comes down to the quality of your legal defense. The firms ranked below have the federal criminal defense expertise to protect your rights, negotiate with prosecutors, and — when the facts support it — keep you out of prison.
Oregon's tech industry in the Portland metro (Intel, Nike supply chain), timber operations in rural Oregon, and the state's renowned craft brewing and hospitality industry all filed ERC claims that are now under review. Portland's extended COVID restrictions meant businesses claimed for longer periods.. The Oregon Attorney General's office has actively monitored on ERC fraud matters, adding a state-level dimension to an already complex federal enforcement landscape.
Watch: How ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers Works in Oregon
Video coming soon
Rank 1: Spodek Law Group
Spodek Law Group leads our Oregon rankings because their former federal prosecutors understand ERC fraud investigations from the inside — they know how IRS Criminal Investigation builds cases, how the DOJ Tax Division makes charging decisions, and how to intervene before an audit becomes an indictment. For Oregon business owners facing ERC scrutiny through the District of Oregon (Portland), Spodek's team has secured dismissals, favorable plea resolutions, and successful voluntary disclosures in tax fraud matters nationwide. Their experience defending technology companies in the Portland metro, timber operations across rural Oregon, craft breweries and distilleries throughout the state, agricultural operations in the Willamette Valley, and healthcare providers in Portland and Eugene against federal tax investigations makes them the clear #1 choice.
Show Pros & Cons
Pros
- Former federal prosecutors on staff who understand DOJ charging decisions from the inside
- Handles DOJ criminal investigations, IRS Criminal Investigation audits, and grand jury subpoenas nationwide
- Nationwide practice with experience in every federal judicial district
- Has won dismissals and favorable plea resolutions in ERC fraud cases
Cons
- Higher minimum case threshold — focuses on claims above $50,000
- Premium pricing reflects the severity of federal criminal defense work
Rank 2: Raiser, Kenniff & Lonstein
- Min. Debt
- $25,000+ in ERC claims
- Fees
- Flat fee + hourly for litigation
- Timeline
- 6-24 months
Rank 3: Tully Rinckey
- Min. Debt
- $25,000+ in ERC claims
- Fees
- Hourly + flat fee options
- Timeline
- 6-18 months
Rank 4: Kostelanetz LLP
- Min. Debt
- $50,000+ in ERC claims
- Fees
- Hourly billing
- Timeline
- 6-24 months
Expected Settlement Timelines
Midpoint of each provider's typical settlement window (months).
Oregon ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers Compared
- Min. Debt
- $50,000+ in ERC claims
- Avg. Fees
- Contingency + consultation-based
- Timeline
- 6-18 months
- Min. Debt
- $25,000+ in ERC claims
- Avg. Fees
- Flat fee + hourly for litigation
- Timeline
- 6-24 months
- Min. Debt
- $25,000+ in ERC claims
- Avg. Fees
- Hourly + flat fee options
- Timeline
- 6-18 months
- Min. Debt
- $50,000+ in ERC claims
- Avg. Fees
- Hourly billing
- Timeline
- 6-24 months
Our Methodology
We spent 130 hours evaluating ERC fraud defense attorneys and firms serving Oregon. We assessed each firm's federal criminal defense record in the District of Oregon, reviewed their experience with IRS Criminal Investigation matters, verified their bar standing, and interviewed Oregon business owners who engaged their services for ERC-related matters.
ERC Fraud Defense Expertise
Federal Criminal Defense Record
Client Reviews & Reputation
Fee Transparency & Access
Evaluation Weight Distribution
Total U.S. consumer debt has surpassed $4.8 trillion, not including mortgages or student loans.
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkEconomic Snapshot
Source: Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED). Indicators refresh daily.
About Oregon
ERC fraud in Oregon follows a predictable federal prosecution path. IRS Criminal Investigation agents, operating from the Portland IRS CI field office, build the case by reviewing amended returns (For…
CFPB Complaint Tracker
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. All financial complaints filed from OR in the past 12 months.
How ERC Fraud Is Prosecuted in Oregon
ERC fraud in Oregon follows a predictable federal prosecution path. IRS Criminal Investigation agents, operating from the Portland IRS CI field office, build the case by reviewing amended returns (Form 941-X), interviewing employees, subpoenaing payroll records, and tracing refund payments. When the evidence supports criminal charges, IRS CI refers the case to the DOJ Tax Division or the local U.S. Attorney's office in the District of Oregon (Portland). Charges typically include filing false claims (26 U.S.C. §7206), tax fraud (26 U.S.C. §7201), wire fraud (18 U.S.C. §1343), and conspiracy (18 U.S.C. §371). Penalties range from substantial fines to five years in federal prison per count. The Oregon Attorney General's office has actively monitored on ERC fraud investigations, creating potential state-level exposure in addition to federal charges. For Oregon business owners, the critical window is between the audit notice and the criminal referral — this is when a skilled defense attorney can most effectively intervene.
Alternatives to Criminal Defense for ERC Issues in Oregon
- IRS Voluntary Disclosure Program: The IRS ERC Voluntary Disclosure Program allows business owners to repay 85% of the ERC received (keeping 15% for promoter fees already paid) in exchange for elimination of criminal exposure and reduced penalties. This is the strongest option for Oregon business owners who have not yet been contacted by IRS CI.
- Amended Return (Form 941-X): Filing an amended return to withdraw an ERC claim can resolve civil exposure before the IRS initiates an audit. The IRS has processed hundreds of thousands of ERC withdrawal requests and generally treats voluntary corrections favorably.
- IRS Appeals: If the IRS disallows your ERC claim, you can appeal within the IRS before going to Tax Court. IRS Appeals officers in Oregon have authority to settle ERC disputes based on the hazards of litigation, often resulting in reduced penalties.
- U.S. Tax Court: If administrative appeals fail, you can petition the U.S. Tax Court to challenge the IRS's disallowance of your ERC claim. Tax Court litigation requires specialized counsel but provides an independent judicial review of whether your claim was legitimate.
ERC Fraud Defense in Oregon: What Business Owners Need to Know
Oregon businesses across technology, timber, agriculture, manufacturing, craft brewing, and healthcare claimed the Employee Retention Credit during COVID, many after being contacted by ERC promoter mills that guaranteed eligibility and charged contingency fees of 15-25% of the refund. The IRS has since identified Oregon as a state with significant ERC overclaiming, and investigations through the District of Oregon (Portland) have accelerated throughout 2025 and into 2026.
The Difference Between a Mistake and Fraud
Not every incorrect ERC claim is criminal fraud. The IRS distinguishes between business owners who made good-faith mistakes based on bad advice from promoters and those who knowingly filed false claims. The difference often determines whether you face a civil penalty (repayment plus 20-75% penalty) or criminal prosecution (fines plus prison). A qualified ERC fraud defense attorney can help establish that you relied on professional advice, cooperated with the IRS, and did not knowingly submit false information. The IRS Voluntary Disclosure Program offers a structured path to resolve questionable ERC claims before criminal referral — but eligibility requires that you come forward before the IRS contacts you.
Which Oregon Industries Are Under ERC Scrutiny
Oregon's technology sector and timber industry. The IRS is focusing its Oregon ERC audits on industries where claiming patterns suggest promoter-driven fraud: technology companies in the Portland metro, timber operations across rural Oregon, craft breweries and distilleries throughout the state, agricultural operations in the Willamette Valley, and healthcare providers in Portland and Eugene. ERC promoter mills targeted these businesses with promises of guaranteed eligibility and easy refunds, often filing claims without verifying that the business actually experienced qualifying revenue declines or government-ordered shutdowns. In many cases, the promoter collected a 15-25% contingency fee and disappeared, leaving the business owner holding a fraudulent claim and facing full liability for repayment, penalties, and potential criminal prosecution.
About the Author
Michael Torres
Senior Legal & Finance Editor
Oregon Attorney General
Attorney General Dan Rayfield and a coalition of 13 other states and local governments sued the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over its failure to implement a life-saving 2024 Clean Air Act rule strengthening national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter (PM2.5), commonly known as soot. In a lawsuit filed earlier today, the coalition called for a court order to ensure EPA takes the key steps required by Congress to initiate the rule’s protections and kick-off implementation planning. “Soot kills people. It causes heart attacks, triggers asthma, and cuts lives short – and the science on this is not in dispute,” said Attorney General Rayfield.
· Apr 24, 2026AG Rayfield: “President Trump wants to turn letter carriers into election gatekeepers.” Attorney General Dan Rayfield and a coalition of 23 other attorneys general, along with the Governor of Pennsylvania have asked a federal court to permanently block President Trump’s executive order that unlawfully restricts mail voting. The coalition filed a motion for summary judgment in their ongoing challenge to the order that attempts to limit voter eligibility and mail voting to lists of voters pre-authorized by the federal government. The power to regulate elections belongs primarily to the States. The President has no constitutional authority to make or alter laws governing federal elections. “The U.S. Postal Service delivers the mail,” said Attorney General Rayfield.
· Apr 24, 2026Attorney General Dan Rayfield announced today that Marcus Sanfratello, 73, has been sentenced to 20 years in prison for the 1983 homicide of Teresa Peroni, closing a case that went unsolved for more than four decades. Sanfratello pleaded guilty to Manslaughter in the First Degree in Josephine County Circuit Court. Under the terms of the plea agreement, he will serve a minimum of 10 years. “For Teresa Peroni’s family, this has been a 43-year wait for an answer they never should have had to wait for,” said Attorney General Rayfield. “Cases like this remind us of why we don’t give up. It doesn’t matter how many years have passed – if someone took a life, we’re going to keep working until we can hold them accountable.
· Apr 22, 2026More ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers Guides Near Oregon
Best ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers in Washington
Compare top ERC fraud defense firms serving Washington business owners.
Best ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers in California
Compare top ERC fraud defense firms serving California business owners.
Best ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers in Idaho
Compare top ERC fraud defense firms serving Idaho business owners.
Best ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers (National)
Our national rankings for ERC fraud defense firms.
Oregon ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers FAQ
Who is the best ERC fraud defense lawyer in Oregon for 2026?
What are the penalties for ERC fraud in Oregon?
Can I still use the IRS Voluntary Disclosure Program for ERC claims in Oregon?
What should I do if IRS agents visit my Oregon business about ERC claims?
Which Oregon industries are most targeted for ERC fraud audits?
Important Legal Disclaimers
- This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified attorney before taking any action regarding an ERC fraud investigation or audit.
- Results vary by case. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Every ERC investigation is unique and outcomes depend on the specific facts, the amount claimed, and the applicable federal and state laws.
- Attorney fees vary by firm, case complexity, and geographic location. Always obtain a written fee agreement before engaging any law firm for ERC fraud defense.
- Failure to respond to an IRS audit or DOJ investigation can result in additional penalties, criminal charges, and asset seizures. Time-sensitive deadlines apply to voluntary disclosure programs.
- The Employee Retention Credit program rules changed multiple times. Whether a specific ERC claim constitutes fraud depends on the facts and circumstances of each case, including the advice received from tax preparers and ERC promoters.
- Zogby does not provide legal or tax services. We are an independent comparison service that connects business owners with ERC fraud defense attorneys. We may receive compensation from featured firms.
The information provided on this page is for general informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended as legal or tax advice. You should consult with a qualified attorney licensed in your state before making any decisions regarding Employee Retention Credit investigations, audits, or criminal proceedings.
Editorial Independence
We make money from some companies on this page. That doesn't change our rankings -- the editorial team scores every product independently, and the business side has no say in what we recommend.