Fenix Capital Funding logo

Fenix Capital Funding

Best for Second Position

Specializing in second and third position merchant cash advances for businesses with existing funding

4.0 (1,200+ reviews)
Michael Chen Written by Michael Chen, CFA, CFP
Rachel Kim Reviewed by Rachel Kim, JD, CRCM
Updated: March 7, 2026

At a Glance

Founded
2015
Headquarters
New York, NY
Total Funded
$300M+
Advance Range
$5K - $250K
Factor Rate
1.20 - 1.50
BBB Rating
B+

Rating Breakdown

About Fenix Capital Funding

Fenix Capital Funding is a New York-based MCA provider founded in 2015 that has carved out a specialized niche in the second and third position funding space. While the majority of MCA companies refuse to fund businesses that already have an active advance due to the elevated risk of default, Fenix has built its entire business model around underwriting these exact scenarios. Their proprietary cash flow analysis calculates what they call "net available daily cash" by subtracting all existing MCA daily payments, fixed operating expenses, payroll obligations, and estimated tax liabilities from the merchant's average daily deposits. A business typically needs to show net available daily cash of at least $200-$300 after existing obligations to qualify for a second-position advance. Factor rates for second-position deals range from 1.25 to 1.45, while third-position advances carry rates of 1.35 to 1.50, reflecting the compounding risk of multiple simultaneous obligations. With over $300 million funded, Fenix Capital has developed deep expertise in evaluating stacking risk. Their underwriting team manually reviews every application, specifically analyzing the first-position funder's remaining balance, daily payment amount, estimated remaining term, and whether the first-position agreement includes an anti-stacking clause. Fenix will not fund if the first-position funder explicitly prohibits stacking and actively enforces that clause, but they will fund if the first-position agreement is silent on stacking or if the funder is known to tolerate it. Fenix files their own UCC-1 lien in second position and structures daily ACH payments to debit after the first-position payment has cleared, typically scheduling their pull for early afternoon rather than morning. Origination fees range from 2% to 5% of the advance amount, higher than first-position funders, and repayment terms are typically shorter at 3 to 12 months to reduce cumulative exposure time.

Key Features

Second & Third Position Specialist

Fenix Capital is purpose-built for businesses that already have one or two active MCA positions. Their underwriting model calculates net available daily cash after all existing obligations, requiring a minimum of $200-$300 in free daily cash flow before approving a supplemental advance. They evaluate the first-position funder's remaining balance, daily payment, and anti-stacking clause language before making a decision, ensuring they only fund situations where the merchant can realistically sustain the additional burden.

Proprietary Cash Flow Analysis

Fenix's underwriting goes far beyond reviewing bank balances. Their model subtracts each existing MCA's daily ACH debit, fixed monthly expenses like rent and payroll, estimated quarterly tax obligations, and seasonal revenue adjustments to arrive at what they call the merchant's true daily surplus. This analysis requires manual review by an experienced underwriter who can interpret irregular deposits, large one-time transactions, and the difference between organic revenue and internal transfers or loan proceeds.

Fast Supplemental Funding

Fenix can approve and fund a second-position advance within 24 hours of receiving a complete application, which includes bank statements and details of existing MCA agreements. They understand that businesses seeking second-position funding typically face urgent capital needs such as emergency repairs, payroll shortfalls, or time-sensitive inventory purchases. Their afternoon ACH pull schedule is specifically designed to avoid competing with the first-position funder's morning debit.

Transparent Stacking Assessment

Before finalizing any second or third position advance, Fenix provides a full obligation summary that shows the merchant's total daily ACH burden across all positions, the combined effective cost of capital, and a projected timeline showing when each position is expected to be fully repaid. This transparency is rare in the stacking space, where many funders deliberately obscure the cumulative cost. Fenix's philosophy is that informed merchants default less often.

How It Works

1

Submit Application

Complete the online application and provide 3 months of bank statements along with details of any existing MCA agreements.

2

Cash Flow Analysis

Fenix's team evaluates your remaining cash flow after existing obligations to determine how much additional capital your business can handle.

3

Receive Position Offer

Get a clear offer showing the advance amount, factor rate, daily payment, and how it fits alongside your existing repayment schedule.

4

Accept & Fund

Sign the agreement electronically and receive supplemental funds in your business account within 24-48 hours.

What They Do

  • Second Position MCA
  • Third Position MCA
  • Merchant Cash Advance
  • Revenue-Based Financing

Debt Types They Take On

  • Merchant Cash Advance
  • Second Position Advance
  • Third Position Advance
  • Revenue-Based Financing

Fee & Cost Structure

Factor Rate
1.20 - 1.50
Origination Fee
2% - 5% of advance amount
Repayment Term
3 - 12 months (daily or weekly ACH)

Regulatory & Trust

BBB Rating
B+
CFPB Complaints
~45
Accreditations
Small Business Finance Association
States Served
All 50 states

Review Summary

3.8
Trustpilot
4.0
Google
1,200+
Total Reviews

Notable Case Studies

Restaurant Needing Emergency Kitchen Repairs

A Mexican restaurant in Queens, NY with an existing $50,000 first-position MCA (daily payment of $310, 5 months remaining) needed an additional $30,000 urgently after a commercial refrigerator and hood system both failed. The restaurant was generating $2,800 in average daily deposits. Three other MCA providers declined the application immediately upon learning about the existing advance.

Fenix approved a $30,000 second-position advance at a 1.35 factor rate with daily payments of $195 scheduled for 1:30 PM, after the first-position funder's 9 AM debit. Combined daily MCA obligation was $505, leaving approximately $600 in daily free cash flow. Total repayment on the Fenix advance was $40,500 over 7 months. The kitchen was operational within 3 days, avoiding an estimated $35,000 in lost revenue from a two-week closure.

Auto Repair Shop Bridging Payroll Gap

An auto repair shop in suburban New Jersey with an existing $75,000 first-position MCA paying $420 daily needed $20,000 to cover a two-week payroll gap caused by a major insurance reimbursement delay. The shop employed 8 mechanics and was generating $3,200 in average daily deposits. The owner had already missed one payroll and risked losing key employees.

Fenix approved $20,000 in second position at a 1.32 factor rate with daily payments of $132 over a 6-month term, totaling $26,400 in repayment. The combined daily obligation of $552 left approximately $550 in daily surplus. Payroll was met the following Monday, all employees were retained, and the insurance reimbursement of $28,000 arrived 11 days later.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • One of the few MCA providers that specifically underwrites second and third position advances, giving businesses with existing obligations a funding option that nearly all other companies refuse to provide.
  • Fenix's proprietary net available daily cash analysis provides a more accurate risk assessment than simple bank balance reviews, reducing the likelihood of approving merchants who cannot sustain the additional payments.
  • Funding is typically delivered within 24 hours of a complete application, which is critical for businesses in second-position scenarios that are often facing urgent cash flow emergencies.
  • The full obligation summary provided before signing shows total daily burden across all positions, giving merchants a clear picture of their combined repayment commitment rather than hiding the cumulative cost.
  • Afternoon ACH scheduling avoids competing with first-position morning debits, reducing the risk of NSF returns that could trigger defaults on both the first and second position advances simultaneously.

Cons

  • Factor rates of 1.25-1.50 for second position and 1.35-1.50 for third position are significantly higher than first-position rates, and when combined with the cost of the existing advance, the effective annualized cost of all capital can exceed 150-200%.
  • Origination fees of 2-5% are deducted from the advance amount at funding, meaning a $30,000 advance with a 4% origination fee delivers only $28,800 in net proceeds while the full $30,000 is subject to the factor rate calculation.
  • Stacking advances compounds the risk of default because multiple daily ACH debits drain the business account simultaneously, and a downturn in revenue can quickly create a cascade of returned payments across all positions.
  • Fenix's maximum advance of $250,000 in any single position may not be sufficient for businesses with large capital needs, particularly in industries like construction or healthcare where single funding requirements can exceed $500,000.

User Reviews (28)

3.8
28 reviews
5 stars
10
4 stars
8
3 stars
6
2 stars
3
1 star
1
Showing 10 of 28 reviews
D
Dennis R.
Feb 22, 2026

solid funder not perfect but reliable

good funder, not the cheapest. $120,000 at 1.28 for my daycare. Everything was professional and transparent. I just think the factor rate could be lower given my revenue ($32K/mo) and clean bank statements. Ace Funding might have been cheaper but Fenix Capital Funding was faster.

R
roofing_reality
Dec 23, 2025

solid B+ experience

Applied to Fenix Capital Funding and Ace Funding simultaneously. Fenix Capital Funding was faster and the rate was slightly better (1.26 vs 1.22). Got $8,000 deposited 2 days later for my dental practice. Process was smooth. Took off one star because the origination fee wasn't mentioned until contract stage.

P
plumber_needs_capital
Nov 14, 2025

this is how business funding should work

Got $150,000 from Fenix Capital Funding for my flooring company. The whole process was honestly smoother than I expected -- applied on a Monday, had the money in my account by the next business day. Factor rate was 1.25 which tbh is way better than the 1.21 I was quoted by Yellowstone Capital. Daily ACH is $1,019 which is manageable on my $55K/month. Already halfway through repayment and zero issues. Would 100% use them again.

E
Edward N.
Nov 11, 2025

they actually delivered

BEST DECISION I MADE THIS YEAR was going with Fenix Capital Funding instead of stacking two advances from different companies. Got $120,000 in one clean position at 1.22. Repaying $728/day which is totally manageable on $65K/month revenue. My accountant said this was the least predatory MCA contract he's reviewed.

C
Chris B.
Nov 5, 2025

funded fast rate was fair

Easy process, funded $100,000 for my pest control company. Factor rate 1.22 is fair for what it is. Daily ACH of $632 is manageable. Rep Mike was professional and responsive throughout.

S
Sarah K.
Oct 2, 2025

not terrible but wouldnt rush to recommend

Mixed feelings about Fenix Capital Funding. They funded $80,000 for my staffing agency which I needed, but the 1.39 factor rate means I'm paying back $111,200. That's a LOT of money. Daily ACH of $520 is eating into my cash flow more than expected. Would I do it again? Probably. But I'd negotiate harder on the rate.

W
warehouse_ops
Sep 16, 2025

daily debits are killing my cash flow

Not impressed with Fenix Capital Funding. Applied for $120,000, they approved a lower amount at a 1.39 factor rate which is honestly too high. Total repayment of $166,800? That's $46,800 in fees. I know MCAs aren't cheap but this felt excessive. The daily debit of $847 is manageable but expected better from them.

S
startup_struggles
Jul 29, 2025

pleasantly surprised tbh

Got $120,000 from Fenix Capital Funding for my gym. The whole process was honestly smoother than I expected -- applied on a Monday, had the money in my account by the next morning. Factor rate was 1.28 which tbh is way better than the 1.42 I was quoted by Yellowstone Capital. Daily ACH is $821 which is manageable on my $28K/month. Already halfway through repayment and zero issues. Would 100% use them again.

B
bodega_boss
Jul 17, 2025

worst financial decision ever

Absolutely terrible. Fenix Capital Funding took forever to fund instead of the 2 days later they promised. Then the daily debit was higher than quoted -- the contract had a different number and I didn't catch it until after signing. Now I'm stuck paying $798/day on a $120,000 advance.

R
restaurant_guy_nyc
Jun 19, 2025

decent funder fair terms

Fenix Capital Funding approved me for $150,000 with a 665 credit score which was honestly surprising. Factor rate was 1.26 so total repayment is $189,000. It's a lot in fees but I needed capital and banks weren't an option. Used the money for a new truck and ROI has been positive.

Write a Review

Frequently Asked Questions

Fenix calculates what they call net available daily cash by taking your average daily deposits over the most recent 90 days and subtracting all existing MCA daily payments, fixed monthly expenses divided by business days, estimated tax obligations, and a buffer for revenue variability. They typically require a minimum of $200-$300 in net available daily cash after the proposed second-position payment to approve the advance. If your business deposits $2,000 per day and has $900 in existing daily obligations including the first MCA, Fenix would calculate your available cash at approximately $1,100 and size the second-position advance so that the new daily payment does not consume more than 40-50% of that surplus.
Yes, Fenix requests a copy of your existing MCA agreement or at least the relevant terms. They specifically review the anti-stacking clause, if one exists. If the first-position funder explicitly prohibits additional advances and is known to actively enforce that clause through monitoring or default declarations, Fenix will typically decline the application to avoid creating legal exposure for the merchant. However, if the first-position agreement is silent on stacking, or if the funder is known in the industry to tolerate second-position advances, Fenix will proceed with underwriting.
Depends on your first-position agreement. If there's an anti-stacking clause and the first funder catches wind of it, they can declare you in default, accelerate the remaining balance, and go after your personal guarantee. And yes, some first-position funders actively monitor your bank. They'll notice new ACH debits or a shrinking daily balance. Fenix tries to mitigate this by scheduling their debits in the afternoon, after the morning pull window most funders use. But that's a workaround, not a guarantee. Reduced balances are hard to hide from anyone paying attention.
Fenix files their own UCC-1, which slots in behind the first-position funder's existing filing. If everything goes sideways and assets get liquidated, the first-position funder gets paid first. Fenix only collects from whatever's left over -- if there's anything left over. That's exactly why second-position factor rates are higher: Fenix is taking on more risk because they're second in line to get paid when things go wrong.
Fenix does not set a fixed maximum daily burden in dollar terms, but they generally will not approve a second or third position advance if the combined daily obligations across all MCA positions would exceed 35-40% of the merchant's average daily deposits. For example, if a business deposits $3,000 per day on average, Fenix would cap total daily MCA payments at approximately $1,050-$1,200 across all positions combined. Beyond this threshold, their data shows default rates increase sharply. They will also decline if the combined effective cost of capital across all positions would result in total repayment exceeding 45% of projected gross revenue over the advance term.

Embed This Badge on Your Website

Fenix Capital Funding has earned a Best for Second Position designation from Zogby. Display this badge on your website to showcase your rating.

Paste this code anywhere in your website's HTML. The badge links back to your full Zogby review.

Important Merchant Cash Advance Disclaimers

  • A merchant cash advance is not a loan. It is a purchase of future receivables at a discount. Factor rates, not APRs, are used to express the cost of capital. Effective APRs on merchant cash advances can range from 40% to over 350% depending on the term and factor rate.
  • Repayment is typically collected daily or weekly via automatic ACH debits or a percentage of credit card sales. This means your repayment amount fluctuates with revenue but withdrawals occur every business day, which can strain cash flow during slow periods.
  • Most MCA agreements require a personal guarantee from the business owner. In the event of default, the MCA provider may pursue the owner's personal assets, including bank accounts and property.
  • MCA providers commonly file UCC-1 liens against your business assets. This lien may prevent you from obtaining additional financing until the advance is fully repaid and the lien is released.
  • Merchant cash advances are not regulated by federal lending laws such as the Truth in Lending Act (TILA). State regulations vary widely, and some states have limited consumer protections for MCA products.
  • Stacking multiple merchant cash advances (taking a second advance before the first is repaid) significantly increases the risk of default and can lead to aggressive collection actions including confessions of judgment in some jurisdictions.
  • Zogby does not provide merchant cash advances or business financing. We are an independent comparison service. We do not fund advances, process applications, or guarantee approval on your behalf.

This page is informational, not financial or legal advice. Talk to a qualified professional before making any big money decisions.

Editorial Independence

We make money from some companies on this page. That doesn't change our rankings -- the editorial team scores every product independently, and the business side has no say in what we recommend.

Last Updated
March 7, 2026
Fact-Checked
March 5, 2026