Best Criminal Defense Lawyers in Washington (2026)

2Alternatives to Trial for Criminal Cases in Washington

• Deferred Prosecution: Under RCW 10.05, defendants charged with certain misdemeanors (particularly DUI) may petition for deferred prosecution, which involves completing a two-year treatment program. If successful, the charges are dismissed. This option is available only once in a lifetime and requires a finding that the defendant suffers from alcoholism, drug addiction, or mental health issues that contributed to the offense.
• Stipulated Order of Continuance (SOC): Many Washington courts allow stipulated orders of continuance, where the defendant agrees to meet certain conditions (community service, treatment, no new offenses) over a period of time. If all conditions are met, the charges are dismissed. SOCs are commonly used for first-time, non-violent offenses and provide an effective path to avoiding a criminal record.
• Drug Courts: Washington operates drug courts in most counties under RCW 2.30. These specialty courts provide treatment-based supervision for defendants with substance abuse disorders. Completion of the program, which typically lasts 12 to 18 months, can result in charge reduction or dismissal. King County’s drug court is one of the oldest and most established in the nation.
• Sentencing Alternatives: The Sentencing Reform Act provides several alternatives for eligible defendants, including the Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA, RCW 9.94A.660), the First-Time Offender Waiver (RCW 9.94A.650), and the Family & Offender Sentencing Alternative (FOSA). Each provides a path to shorter sentences, community supervision, or treatment in lieu of incarceration.

4The Sentencing Reform Act Grid

Washington’s Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (RCW 9.94A) replaced judicial discretion with a structured sentencing grid. Each felony is assigned a seriousness level (I through XVI), and each defendant receives an offender score based on prior convictions. The intersection of seriousness level and offender score produces a standard sentencing range that is presumptive — judges can depart from the range only by making specific factual findings. Defense attorneys who can successfully challenge offender score calculations (by arguing that prior convictions should not count, were improperly scored, or have washed out) can shift the sentencing range dramatically. For example, reducing an offender score from 3 to 2 on a seriousness level VI offense can reduce the standard range by several months to years.

5Impact of State v. Blake on Criminal Defense

The Blake decision’s impact extends far beyond drug possession cases. Thousands of prior drug possession convictions have been vacated, and those vacated convictions no longer count toward offender scores under the sentencing grid. This means that defendants currently facing charges may have lower offender scores than prosecutors initially calculated, resulting in shorter standard ranges. Defense attorneys who identify Blake-eligible prior convictions and move to vacate them can achieve significant sentencing reductions for their clients — even in cases that have nothing to do with drug possession. This downstream effect makes Blake one of the most consequential criminal defense tools in Washington.

6Criminal Defense in Washington: What Defendants Need to Know

Washington’s criminal justice system is in a period of significant transition. The abolition of the death penalty, the Blake decision’s impact on drug possession law, police accountability reforms, and ongoing sentencing reform debates have created an environment where the law is changing faster than many practitioners can keep up. Understanding the current state of Washington criminal law — and where it is heading — is essential for effective defense.