Skip to content
2026 New Hampshire Rankings

Best ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers in New Hampshire (2026)

The IRS and DOJ have intensified ERC fraud enforcement across New Hampshire, with investigations flowing through the District of New Hampshire. We ranked the top ERC fraud defense lawyers for New Hampshire business owners facing audits, repayment demands, and criminal investigations related to Employee Retention Credit claims.

MT
Michael Torres
Updated
ERC Fraud Defense
Fact-checked March 2026

The best ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers company in New Hampshire for 2026 is Spodek Law Group, rated 4.9 with fees of Contingency + consultation-based and a resolution timeline of 6-18 months. Other top-rated options include Raiser, Kenniff & Lonstein (rated 4.8) and Tully Rinckey (rated 4.7).

Top Pick
Spodek Law Group
Rating
4.9
Avg. Fees
Contingency + consultation-based

Last updated

Key Takeaways: ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers in New Hampshire

1 Spodek Law Group is our #1-ranked ERC fraud defense firm for New Hampshire in 2026 — their former federal prosecutors and nationwide practice make them the top choice for business owners facing IRS Criminal Investigation audits and DOJ referrals. 2 ERC fraud cases in New Hampshire are prosecuted through the District of New Hampshire, where federal prosecutors have been filing charges against both ERC promoters and business owners who knowingly filed false claims. 3 the nearest IRS CI field office in Boston (covering New Hampshire) handles ERC fraud investigations across the state, and the IRS has placed ERC fraud among its top enforcement priorities through at least 2027. 4 Business owners who received bad advice from ERC mills may qualify for the IRS Voluntary Disclosure Program, which can eliminate criminal exposure and reduce penalties — but the window is closing as investigations accelerate.

Zogby is an independent, advertising-supported comparison service. We may receive compensation from the companies whose products appear on this site. This compensation may impact how, where, and in what order products appear. Zogby does not include every financial company or every product available in the marketplace.

The Employee Retention Credit was designed to keep workers on payroll during COVID. In New Hampshire, thousands of businesses filed ERC claims — many guided by aggressive promoters who promised easy money and disappeared before the IRS started asking questions. Now the IRS Criminal Investigation division, operating through the District of New Hampshire (Concord), is auditing claims, demanding repayment with penalties, and referring cases to the DOJ for criminal prosecution. If you are a New Hampshire business owner who received an ERC refund and now faces an audit notice, a grand jury subpoena, or a visit from IRS special agents, the window to act is narrowing.

The distinction between a good-faith mistake and criminal fraud often comes down to the quality of your legal defense. The firms ranked below have the federal criminal defense expertise to protect your rights, negotiate with prosecutors, and — when the facts support it — keep you out of prison.

New Hampshire's ski resorts, lakeside tourism businesses, and manufacturing firms all filed ERC claims, many through Boston-area promoters who targeted New England small businesses. The state's defense contracting sector and technology companies along the I-93 corridor also generated claims now under review.. The New Hampshire Attorney General's office has monitored on ERC fraud matters, adding a state-level dimension to an already complex federal enforcement landscape.

How It Works

1

Free Case Review

Speak with a licensed attorney who will evaluate your situation at no cost.

2

Legal Analysis

Your legal team reviews the evidence, charges, and all available defense options.

3

Defense Strategy

A tailored defense plan is built around the strongest arguments for your case.

4

Resolution

Your attorney works toward the best possible outcome — dismissal, reduction, or acquittal.

Quick Answer

Spodek Law Group

4.9/5 Best Overall for ERC Fraud Defense

Our top-rated pick for reliability, customer service, and proven results.

Did You Know?
$17,000

The average American household carries over $17,000 in credit card debt, making professional debt relief a critical resource.

Source: Federal Reserve, 2024

Economic Snapshot

Source: Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED). Indicators refresh daily.

About New Hampshire

ERC fraud in New Hampshire follows a predictable federal prosecution path. IRS Criminal Investigation agents, operating from the nearest IRS CI field office in Boston (covering New Hampshire), build t…

Alternatives to Criminal Defense for ERC Issues in New Hampshire

  • IRS Voluntary Disclosure Program: The IRS ERC Voluntary Disclosure Program allows business owners to repay 85% of the ERC received (keeping 15% for promoter fees already paid) in exchange for elimination of criminal exposure and reduced penalties. This is the strongest option for New Hampshire business owners who have not yet been contacted by IRS CI.
  • Amended Return (Form 941-X): Filing an amended return to withdraw an ERC claim can resolve civil exposure before the IRS initiates an audit. The IRS has processed hundreds of thousands of ERC withdrawal requests and generally treats voluntary corrections favorably.
  • IRS Appeals: If the IRS disallows your ERC claim, you can appeal within the IRS before going to Tax Court. IRS Appeals officers in New Hampshire have authority to settle ERC disputes based on the hazards of litigation, often resulting in reduced penalties.
  • U.S. Tax Court: If administrative appeals fail, you can petition the U.S. Tax Court to challenge the IRS's disallowance of your ERC claim. Tax Court litigation requires specialized counsel but provides an independent judicial review of whether your claim was legitimate.

The Difference Between a Mistake and Fraud

Not every incorrect ERC claim is criminal fraud. The IRS distinguishes between business owners who made good-faith mistakes based on bad advice from promoters and those who knowingly filed false claims. The difference often determines whether you face a civil penalty (repayment plus 20-75% penalty) or criminal prosecution (fines plus prison). A qualified ERC fraud defense attorney can help establish that you relied on professional advice, cooperated with the IRS, and did not knowingly submit false information. The IRS Voluntary Disclosure Program offers a structured path to resolve questionable ERC claims before criminal referral — but eligibility requires that you come forward before the IRS contacts you.

ERC Fraud Defense in New Hampshire: What Business Owners Need to Know

New Hampshire businesses across tourism, manufacturing, technology, healthcare, and defense contracting claimed the Employee Retention Credit during COVID, many after being contacted by ERC promoter mills that guaranteed eligibility and charged contingency fees of 15-25% of the refund. The IRS has since identified New Hampshire as a state with significant ERC overclaiming, and investigations through the District of New Hampshire (Concord) have accelerated throughout 2025 and into 2026.

Which New Hampshire Industries Are Under ERC Scrutiny

New Hampshire's seasonal tourism economy and defense contracting sector. The IRS is focusing its New Hampshire ERC audits on industries where claiming patterns suggest promoter-driven fraud: ski resort operators in the White Mountains, lakeside tourism businesses, manufacturing firms in the southern tier, defense contractors in the Nashua-Manchester corridor, and healthcare providers across the state. ERC promoter mills targeted these businesses with promises of guaranteed eligibility and easy refunds, often filing claims without verifying that the business actually experienced qualifying revenue declines or government-ordered shutdowns. In many cases, the promoter collected a 15-25% contingency fee and disappeared, leaving the business owner holding a fraudulent claim and facing full liability for repayment, penalties, and potential criminal prosecution.

How ERC Fraud Is Prosecuted in New Hampshire

ERC fraud in New Hampshire follows a predictable federal prosecution path. IRS Criminal Investigation agents, operating from the nearest IRS CI field office in Boston (covering New Hampshire), build the case by reviewing amended returns (Form 941-X), interviewing employees, subpoenaing payroll records, and tracing refund payments. When the evidence supports criminal charges, IRS CI refers the case to the DOJ Tax Division or the local U.S. Attorney's office in the District of New Hampshire (Concord). Charges typically include filing false claims (26 U.S.C. §7206), tax fraud (26 U.S.C. §7201), wire fraud (18 U.S.C. §1343), and conspiracy (18 U.S.C. §371). Penalties range from substantial fines to five years in federal prison per count. The New Hampshire Attorney General's office has monitored on ERC fraud investigations, creating potential state-level exposure in addition to federal charges. For New Hampshire business owners, the critical window is between the audit notice and the criminal referral — this is when a skilled defense attorney can most effectively intervene.

25+
Law Firms Evaluated
130+
Hours of Research
30+
Sources Cited

ERC Fraud Defense Expertise

30%

We evaluated each firm's track record defending clients against IRS ERC audits, DOJ criminal investigations, and grand jury proceedings — including their ability to negotiate voluntary disclosures and secure case dismissals.

Federal Criminal Defense Record

25%

We reviewed each firm's history in federal tax fraud cases, including dismissals, acquittals, favorable plea agreements, and penalty reductions in ERC-related and similar tax credit fraud matters.

Client Reviews & Reputation

25%

We checked client reviews, bar standing, disciplinary history, peer recognition (Chambers, Legal 500, Super Lawyers), and reputation among federal prosecutors and IRS agents.

Fee Transparency & Access

20%

We assessed fee structures, availability of free consultations, geographic reach, response times for emergency situations (raids, subpoenas), and willingness to handle cases nationwide.

We spent 130 hours evaluating ERC fraud defense attorneys and firms serving New Hampshire. We assessed each firm's federal criminal defense record in the District of New Hampshire, reviewed their experience with IRS Criminal Investigation matters, verified their bar standing, and interviewed New Hampshire business owners who engaged their services for ERC-related matters.

How We Ranked New Hampshire ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers Companies

CFPB Complaint Tracker

Last 12 months · Apr 29, 2026
4,891
Complaints Filed
99%
Timely Response
2,108
Incorrect information on your report
811
Improper use of your report
Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem 715
Attempts to collect debt not owed 124

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. All financial complaints filed from NH in the past 12 months.

Best Overall for ERC Fraud Defense
Spodek Law Group logo

Rank 1: Spodek Law Group

4.9
Editor's Rating

Spodek Law Group leads our New Hampshire rankings because their former federal prosecutors understand ERC fraud investigations from the inside — they know how IRS Criminal Investigation builds cases, how the DOJ Tax Division makes charging decisions, and how to intervene before an audit becomes an indictment. For New Hampshire business owners facing ERC scrutiny through the District of New Hampshire (Concord), Spodek's team has secured dismissals, favorable plea resolutions, and successful voluntary disclosures in tax fraud matters nationwide. Their experience defending ski resort operators in the White Mountains, lakeside tourism businesses, manufacturing firms in the southern tier, defense contractors in the Nashua-Manchester corridor, and healthcare providers across the state against federal tax investigations makes them the clear #1 choice.

Show Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Former federal prosecutors on staff who understand DOJ charging decisions from the inside
  • Handles DOJ criminal investigations, IRS Criminal Investigation audits, and grand jury subpoenas nationwide
  • Nationwide practice with experience in every federal judicial district
  • Has won dismissals and favorable plea resolutions in ERC fraud cases

Cons

  • Higher minimum case threshold — focuses on claims above $50,000
  • Premium pricing reflects the severity of federal criminal defense work
Min. Business Debt: $50,000+ in ERC claims Avg. Fees: Contingency + consultation-based Resolution Timeline: 6-18 months
Best for White-Collar Defense
Raiser, Kenniff & Lonstein logo

Rank 2: Raiser, Kenniff & Lonstein

4.8
Min. Debt
$25,000+ in ERC claims
Fees
Flat fee + hourly for litigation
Timeline
6-24 months
Get a Free Consultation
Best for Federal Tax Defense
Tully Rinckey logo

Rank 3: Tully Rinckey

4.7
Min. Debt
$25,000+ in ERC claims
Fees
Hourly + flat fee options
Timeline
6-18 months
Get a Free Consultation
Best for IRS Criminal Tax
Kostelanetz LLP logo

Rank 4: Kostelanetz LLP

4.6
Min. Debt
$50,000+ in ERC claims
Fees
Hourly billing
Timeline
6-24 months
Get a Free Consultation

New Hampshire ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers Compared

New Hampshire ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers companies compared by minimum debt, fees, timeline, and rating
Metric Spodek Law Group Top Pick Raiser, Kenniff & Lonstein Tully Rinckey Kostelanetz LLP
Min. Debt $50,000+ in ERC claims $25,000+ in ERC claims $25,000+ in ERC claims $50,000+ in ERC claims
Avg. Fees Contingency + consultation-based Flat fee + hourly for litigation Hourly + flat fee options Hourly billing
Timeline 6-18 months 6-24 months 6-18 months 6-24 months
Rating
4.9
4.8
4.7
4.6

New Hampshire Provider Ratings

MT

Michael Torres

Senior Legal & Finance Editor

Michael Torres is a former commercial litigation paralegal and senior legal editor at Zogby with over 10 years of experience covering business debt law, MCA defense, and creditor-debtor rights. He holds a J.D. from Fordham University School of Law and has been published in the American Bar Association Journal and Law360.

J.D., Fordham Law 10+ Years Experience ABA Member

New Hampshire ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers FAQ

1. Who is the best ERC fraud defense lawyer in New Hampshire for 2026?

Spodek Law Group is our #1-ranked ERC fraud defense firm for New Hampshire in 2026. Their former federal prosecutors have defended tax fraud cases across the District of New Hampshire and understand how IRS Criminal Investigation builds ERC cases from the inside. For white-collar defense, Raiser, Kenniff & Lonstein (#2) offers AV Preeminent-rated representation with 24/7 emergency response.

2. What are the penalties for ERC fraud in New Hampshire?

ERC fraud penalties range from civil to criminal. Civil penalties include repayment of the full ERC amount plus a 20-75% accuracy penalty and interest. Criminal penalties for filing false claims include fines up to $250,000 and up to 5 years in federal prison per count. Wire fraud charges carry up to 20 years. Cases are prosecuted through the District of New Hampshire (Concord).

3. Can I still use the IRS Voluntary Disclosure Program for ERC claims in New Hampshire?

The IRS ERC Voluntary Disclosure Program remains available for New Hampshire business owners who have not yet been contacted by IRS Criminal Investigation. The program allows you to repay 85% of the ERC received in exchange for elimination of criminal exposure. However, eligibility closes once the IRS initiates contact, so acting quickly is essential.

4. What should I do if IRS agents visit my New Hampshire business about ERC claims?

Do not speak with IRS Criminal Investigation agents without an attorney present. You have the right to remain silent and the right to counsel. Politely decline to answer questions, ask for the agent's card, and immediately contact an ERC fraud defense attorney. Anything you say can be used against you in a criminal prosecution.

5. Which New Hampshire industries are most targeted for ERC fraud audits?

The IRS is focusing ERC fraud audits in New Hampshire on industries with high claiming rates relative to actual COVID impact, including tourism, manufacturing, technology, healthcare, and defense contracting. Businesses that used ERC promoter mills, claimed for quarters where they had no qualifying revenue decline, or claimed based on supply chain disruption without proper documentation are at highest risk.

Important Legal Disclaimers

  • This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified attorney before taking any action regarding an ERC fraud investigation or audit.
  • Results vary by case. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Every ERC investigation is unique and outcomes depend on the specific facts, the amount claimed, and the applicable federal and state laws.
  • Attorney fees vary by firm, case complexity, and geographic location. Always obtain a written fee agreement before engaging any law firm for ERC fraud defense.
  • Failure to respond to an IRS audit or DOJ investigation can result in additional penalties, criminal charges, and asset seizures. Time-sensitive deadlines apply to voluntary disclosure programs.
  • The Employee Retention Credit program rules changed multiple times. Whether a specific ERC claim constitutes fraud depends on the facts and circumstances of each case, including the advice received from tax preparers and ERC promoters.
  • Zogby does not provide legal or tax services. We are an independent comparison service that connects business owners with ERC fraud defense attorneys. We may receive compensation from featured firms.

The information provided on this page is for general informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended as legal or tax advice. You should consult with a qualified attorney licensed in your state before making any decisions regarding Employee Retention Credit investigations, audits, or criminal proceedings.

Editorial Independence

We make money from some companies on this page. That doesn't change our rankings -- the editorial team scores every product independently, and the business side has no say in what we recommend.

Last Updated
Fact-Checked
March 12, 2026