Skip to content
2026 Maryland Rankings

Best ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers in Maryland (2026)

The IRS and DOJ have intensified ERC fraud enforcement across Maryland, with investigations flowing through the District of Maryland. We ranked the top ERC fraud defense lawyers for Maryland business owners facing audits, repayment demands, and criminal investigations related to Employee Retention Credit claims.

MT
Michael Torres · Updated

The best ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers company in Maryland for 2026 is Spodek Law Group, rated 4.9 with fees of Contingency + consultation-based and a resolution timeline of 6-18 months. Other top-rated options include Raiser, Kenniff & Lonstein (rated 4.8) and Tully Rinckey (rated 4.7).

Top Pick
Spodek Law Group
Rating
4.9
Avg. Fees
Contingency + consultation-based

Last updated

Key Takeaways: ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers in Maryland

  • 1 Spodek Law Group is our #1-ranked ERC fraud defense firm for Maryland in 2026 — their former federal prosecutors and nationwide practice make them the top choice for business owners facing IRS Criminal Investigation audits and DOJ referrals.
  • 2 ERC fraud cases in Maryland are prosecuted through the District of Maryland, where federal prosecutors have been filing charges against both ERC promoters and business owners who knowingly filed false claims.
  • 3 the Baltimore IRS CI field office handles ERC fraud investigations across the state, and the IRS has placed ERC fraud among its top enforcement priorities through at least 2027.
  • 4 Business owners who received bad advice from ERC mills may qualify for the IRS Voluntary Disclosure Program, which can eliminate criminal exposure and reduce penalties — but the window is closing as investigations accelerate.
Top Pick
Spodek Law Group
4.9

The Employee Retention Credit was designed to keep workers on payroll during COVID. In Maryland, thousands of businesses filed ERC claims — many guided by aggressive promoters who promised easy money and disappeared before the IRS started asking questions. Now the IRS Criminal Investigation division, operating through the District of Maryland (Baltimore and Greenbelt), is auditing claims, demanding repayment with penalties, and referring cases to the DOJ for criminal prosecution. If you are a Maryland business owner who received an ERC refund and now faces an audit notice, a grand jury subpoena, or a visit from IRS special agents, the window to act is narrowing.

The distinction between a good-faith mistake and criminal fraud often comes down to the quality of your legal defense. The firms ranked below have the federal criminal defense expertise to protect your rights, negotiate with prosecutors, and — when the facts support it — keep you out of prison.

Maryland's proximity to Washington, D.C., means a large share of its economy depends on federal contracting — and contractors who claimed ERC while also receiving government contracts face particularly intense scrutiny. The state's biotech corridor along I-270 and Johns Hopkins-anchored healthcare economy also generated substantial claims.. The Maryland Attorney General's office has actively pursued on ERC fraud matters, adding a state-level dimension to an already complex federal enforcement landscape.

Zogby is an independent, advertising-supported comparison service. We may receive compensation from the companies whose products appear on this site. This compensation may impact how, where, and in what order products appear. Zogby does not include every financial company or every product available in the marketplace.

Multi-Factor Comparison

Spodek Law Group

Rating
98
Fee Value
50
Speed
80

Raiser, Kenniff & Lonstein

Rating
96
Fee Value
50
Speed
75

Tully Rinckey

Rating
94
Fee Value
50
Speed
80

Kostelanetz LLP

Rating
92
Fee Value
50
Speed
75

Rating, fee value, and speed scores normalized to 0–100 scale.

Which Maryland Industries Are Under ERC Scrutiny

Maryland's government contracting economy and biotech corridor. The IRS is focusing its Maryland ERC audits on industries where claiming patterns suggest promoter-driven fraud: government contractors in the D.C. suburbs, biotech companies along the I-270 corridor, healthcare systems in Baltimore, cybersecurity firms in Fort Meade area, and hospitality businesses in Annapolis and the Inner Harbor. ERC promoter mills targeted these businesses with promises of guaranteed eligibility and easy refunds, often filing claims without verifying that the business actually experienced qualifying revenue declines or government-ordered shutdowns. In many cases, the promoter collected a 15-25% contingency fee and disappeared, leaving the business owner holding a fraudulent claim and facing full liability for repayment, penalties, and potential criminal prosecution.

Alternatives to Criminal Defense for ERC Issues in Maryland

  • IRS Voluntary Disclosure Program: The IRS ERC Voluntary Disclosure Program allows business owners to repay 85% of the ERC received (keeping 15% for promoter fees already paid) in exchange for elimination of criminal exposure and reduced penalties. This is the strongest option for Maryland business owners who have not yet been contacted by IRS CI.
  • Amended Return (Form 941-X): Filing an amended return to withdraw an ERC claim can resolve civil exposure before the IRS initiates an audit. The IRS has processed hundreds of thousands of ERC withdrawal requests and generally treats voluntary corrections favorably.
  • IRS Appeals: If the IRS disallows your ERC claim, you can appeal within the IRS before going to Tax Court. IRS Appeals officers in Maryland have authority to settle ERC disputes based on the hazards of litigation, often resulting in reduced penalties.
  • U.S. Tax Court: If administrative appeals fail, you can petition the U.S. Tax Court to challenge the IRS's disallowance of your ERC claim. Tax Court litigation requires specialized counsel but provides an independent judicial review of whether your claim was legitimate.

How ERC Fraud Is Prosecuted in Maryland

ERC fraud in Maryland follows a predictable federal prosecution path. IRS Criminal Investigation agents, operating from the Baltimore IRS CI field office, build the case by reviewing amended returns (Form 941-X), interviewing employees, subpoenaing payroll records, and tracing refund payments. When the evidence supports criminal charges, IRS CI refers the case to the DOJ Tax Division or the local U.S. Attorney's office in the District of Maryland (Baltimore and Greenbelt). Charges typically include filing false claims (26 U.S.C. §7206), tax fraud (26 U.S.C. §7201), wire fraud (18 U.S.C. §1343), and conspiracy (18 U.S.C. §371). Penalties range from substantial fines to five years in federal prison per count. The Maryland Attorney General's office has actively pursued on ERC fraud investigations, creating potential state-level exposure in addition to federal charges. For Maryland business owners, the critical window is between the audit notice and the criminal referral — this is when a skilled defense attorney can most effectively intervene.

ERC Fraud Defense in Maryland: What Business Owners Need to Know

Maryland businesses across government contracting, healthcare, cybersecurity, biotechnology, hospitality, and education claimed the Employee Retention Credit during COVID, many after being contacted by ERC promoter mills that guaranteed eligibility and charged contingency fees of 15-25% of the refund. The IRS has since identified Maryland as a state with significant ERC overclaiming, and investigations through the District of Maryland (Baltimore and Greenbelt) have accelerated throughout 2025 and into 2026.

The Difference Between a Mistake and Fraud

Not every incorrect ERC claim is criminal fraud. The IRS distinguishes between business owners who made good-faith mistakes based on bad advice from promoters and those who knowingly filed false claims. The difference often determines whether you face a civil penalty (repayment plus 20-75% penalty) or criminal prosecution (fines plus prison). A qualified ERC fraud defense attorney can help establish that you relied on professional advice, cooperated with the IRS, and did not knowingly submit false information. The IRS Voluntary Disclosure Program offers a structured path to resolve questionable ERC claims before criminal referral — but eligibility requires that you come forward before the IRS contacts you.

CFPB Complaint Tracker

Last 12 months · Apr 29, 2026
142,011
Complaints Filed
100%
Timely Response
74,102
Incorrect information on your report
30,054
Improper use of your report
Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem 24,486
Attempts to collect debt not owed 2,276

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. All financial complaints filed from MD in the past 12 months.

Economic Snapshot

Source: Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED). Indicators refresh daily.

We spent 130 hours evaluating ERC fraud defense attorneys and firms serving Maryland. We assessed each firm's federal criminal defense record in the District of Maryland, reviewed their experience with IRS Criminal Investigation matters, verified their bar standing, and interviewed Maryland business owners who engaged their services for ERC-related matters.

ERC Fraud Defense Expertise

30%

We evaluated each firm's track record defending clients against IRS ERC audits, DOJ criminal investigations, and grand jury proceedings — including their ability to negotiate voluntary disclosures and secure case dismissals.

Federal Criminal Defense Record

25%

We reviewed each firm's history in federal tax fraud cases, including dismissals, acquittals, favorable plea agreements, and penalty reductions in ERC-related and similar tax credit fraud matters.

Client Reviews & Reputation

25%

We checked client reviews, bar standing, disciplinary history, peer recognition (Chambers, Legal 500, Super Lawyers), and reputation among federal prosecutors and IRS agents.

Fee Transparency & Access

20%

We assessed fee structures, availability of free consultations, geographic reach, response times for emergency situations (raids, subpoenas), and willingness to handle cases nationwide.

25+
Law Firms Evaluated
130+
Hours of Research
30+
Sources Cited

How We Ranked Maryland ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers Companies

Best Overall for ERC Fraud Defense
Spodek Law Group logo

Rank 1: Spodek Law Group

4.9
Editor's Rating
Show Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Former federal prosecutors on staff who understand DOJ charging decisions from the inside
  • Handles DOJ criminal investigations, IRS Criminal Investigation audits, and grand jury subpoenas nationwide
  • Nationwide practice with experience in every federal judicial district
  • Has won dismissals and favorable plea resolutions in ERC fraud cases

Cons

  • Higher minimum case threshold — focuses on claims above $50,000
  • Premium pricing reflects the severity of federal criminal defense work

Spodek Law Group leads our Maryland rankings because their former federal prosecutors understand ERC fraud investigations from the inside — they know how IRS Criminal Investigation builds cases, how the DOJ Tax Division makes charging decisions, and how to intervene before an audit becomes an indictment. For Maryland business owners facing ERC scrutiny through the District of Maryland (Baltimore and Greenbelt), Spodek's team has secured dismissals, favorable plea resolutions, and successful voluntary disclosures in tax fraud matters nationwide. Their experience defending government contractors in the D.C. suburbs, biotech companies along the I-270 corridor, healthcare systems in Baltimore, cybersecurity firms in Fort Meade area, and hospitality businesses in Annapolis and the Inner Harbor against federal tax investigations makes them the clear #1 choice.

Min. Business Debt: $50,000+ in ERC claims Avg. Fees: Contingency + consultation-based Resolution Timeline: 6-18 months
Best for White-Collar Defense
Raiser, Kenniff & Lonstein logo

Rank 2: Raiser, Kenniff & Lonstein

4.8
Min. Debt
$25,000+ in ERC claims
Fees
Flat fee + hourly for litigation
Timeline
6-24 months
Get a Free Consultation
Best for Federal Tax Defense
Tully Rinckey logo

Rank 3: Tully Rinckey

4.7
Min. Debt
$25,000+ in ERC claims
Fees
Hourly + flat fee options
Timeline
6-18 months
Get a Free Consultation
Best for IRS Criminal Tax
Kostelanetz LLP logo

Rank 4: Kostelanetz LLP

4.6
Min. Debt
$50,000+ in ERC claims
Fees
Hourly billing
Timeline
6-24 months
Get a Free Consultation

Maryland ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers Compared

Maryland ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers companies compared by minimum debt, fees, timeline, and rating
Metric Spodek Law Group Top Pick Raiser, Kenniff & Lonstein Tully Rinckey Kostelanetz LLP
Min. Debt $50,000+ in ERC claims $25,000+ in ERC claims $25,000+ in ERC claims $50,000+ in ERC claims
Avg. Fees Contingency + consultation-based Flat fee + hourly for litigation Hourly + flat fee options Hourly billing
Timeline 6-18 months 6-24 months 6-18 months 6-24 months
Rating
4.9
4.8
4.7
4.6

Minimum Debt Thresholds

01000020000300004000050000Spodek Law Group50000Raiser, Kenniff & Lonstein25000Tully Rinckey25000Kostelanetz LLP50000
Did You Know?
$4.8T

Total U.S. consumer debt has surpassed $4.8 trillion, not including mortgages or student loans.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Watch: How ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers Works in Maryland

Video coming soon

Maryland ERC Loan Fraud Lawyers FAQ

Who is the best ERC fraud defense lawyer in Maryland for 2026?
Spodek Law Group is our #1-ranked ERC fraud defense firm for Maryland in 2026. Their former federal prosecutors have defended tax fraud cases across the District of Maryland and understand how IRS Criminal Investigation builds ERC cases from the inside. For white-collar defense, Raiser, Kenniff & Lonstein (#2) offers AV Preeminent-rated representation with 24/7 emergency response.
What are the penalties for ERC fraud in Maryland?
ERC fraud penalties range from civil to criminal. Civil penalties include repayment of the full ERC amount plus a 20-75% accuracy penalty and interest. Criminal penalties for filing false claims include fines up to $250,000 and up to 5 years in federal prison per count. Wire fraud charges carry up to 20 years. Cases are prosecuted through the District of Maryland (Baltimore and Greenbelt).
Can I still use the IRS Voluntary Disclosure Program for ERC claims in Maryland?
The IRS ERC Voluntary Disclosure Program remains available for Maryland business owners who have not yet been contacted by IRS Criminal Investigation. The program allows you to repay 85% of the ERC received in exchange for elimination of criminal exposure. However, eligibility closes once the IRS initiates contact, so acting quickly is essential.
What should I do if IRS agents visit my Maryland business about ERC claims?
Do not speak with IRS Criminal Investigation agents without an attorney present. You have the right to remain silent and the right to counsel. Politely decline to answer questions, ask for the agent's card, and immediately contact an ERC fraud defense attorney. Anything you say can be used against you in a criminal prosecution.
Which Maryland industries are most targeted for ERC fraud audits?
The IRS is focusing ERC fraud audits in Maryland on industries with high claiming rates relative to actual COVID impact, including government contracting, healthcare, cybersecurity, biotechnology, hospitality, and education. Businesses that used ERC promoter mills, claimed for quarters where they had no qualifying revenue decline, or claimed based on supply chain disruption without proper documentation are at highest risk.

About the Author

MT

Michael Torres

Senior Legal & Finance Editor

Michael Torres is a former commercial litigation paralegal and senior legal editor at Zogby with over 10 years of experience covering business debt law, MCA defense, and creditor-debtor rights. He holds a J.D. from Fordham University School of Law and has been published in the American Bar Association Journal and Law360.

Important Legal Disclaimers

  • This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified attorney before taking any action regarding an ERC fraud investigation or audit.
  • Results vary by case. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Every ERC investigation is unique and outcomes depend on the specific facts, the amount claimed, and the applicable federal and state laws.
  • Attorney fees vary by firm, case complexity, and geographic location. Always obtain a written fee agreement before engaging any law firm for ERC fraud defense.
  • Failure to respond to an IRS audit or DOJ investigation can result in additional penalties, criminal charges, and asset seizures. Time-sensitive deadlines apply to voluntary disclosure programs.
  • The Employee Retention Credit program rules changed multiple times. Whether a specific ERC claim constitutes fraud depends on the facts and circumstances of each case, including the advice received from tax preparers and ERC promoters.
  • Zogby does not provide legal or tax services. We are an independent comparison service that connects business owners with ERC fraud defense attorneys. We may receive compensation from featured firms.

The information provided on this page is for general informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended as legal or tax advice. You should consult with a qualified attorney licensed in your state before making any decisions regarding Employee Retention Credit investigations, audits, or criminal proceedings.

Editorial Independence

We make money from some companies on this page. That doesn't change our rankings -- the editorial team scores every product independently, and the business side has no say in what we recommend.

Last Updated
Fact-Checked
March 12, 2026