Michigan was the first English-speaking government in the world to abolish the death penalty, and the state's criminal justice system reflects a long tradition of balancing public safety with individual rights. Michigan classifies felonies into Classes A through H plus life offenses, and the Michigan Sentencing Guidelines — while advisory after People v. Lockridge (2015) — still heavily influence judicial sentencing decisions. With the 17th largest state prison system in the country and Wayne County (Detroit) processing one of the highest volumes of criminal cases in the Midwest, Michigan defendants face a system that demands experienced, strategically minded defense attorneys.
We spent 150 hours evaluating criminal defense attorneys and firms serving Michigan. We assessed courtroom track records in Wayne County Circuit Court, the 3rd Circuit Court (Detroit), Oakland County, Kent County (Grand Rapids), and federal courts in the Eastern and Western Districts of Michigan. We reviewed each firm's experience with the Michigan Sentencing Guidelines, habitual offender statute challenges, and outcomes across drug, violent crime, white-collar, and firearms cases.
Zogby is an independent, advertising-supported comparison service. We may receive compensation from the companies whose products appear on this site. This compensation may impact how, where, and in what order products appear. Zogby does not include every financial company or every product available in the marketplace.
Key Takeaways: Criminal Defense Lawyers in Michigan
- 1 Raiser & Kenniff is our #1-ranked criminal defense firm for Michigan in 2026 — their former-prosecutor experience is invaluable when navigating Michigan's complex sentencing guidelines system.
- 2 Michigan has no death penalty. The state abolished capital punishment in 1846, making it the first English-speaking jurisdiction in the world to do so. The maximum sentence is life imprisonment without parole.
- 3 Michigan classifies felonies into Classes A through H plus life offenses. Sentencing guidelines calculate a recommended minimum range based on offense variables (OVs) and prior record variables (PRVs), though guidelines are advisory after People v. Lockridge.
- 4 The habitual offender statute (MCL 769.10–769.13) allows prosecutors to seek enhanced sentences for defendants with prior felony convictions — a fourth habitual offender can face up to life imprisonment regardless of the underlying charge.
- 5 Wayne County Circuit Court handles the largest volume of criminal cases in Michigan, and the Wayne County Prosecutor's Office is one of the busiest in the Midwest.
Best Criminal Defense Lawyers in Michigan
1. Raiser & Kenniff
Min. Business Debt
No minimum
Avg. Fees
Case-dependent
Resolution Timeline
Varies by charge
Raiser & Kenniff leads our Michigan rankings because their former-prosecutor backgrounds provide critical insight into how Michigan prosecutors build cases and evaluate plea offers. Michigan's sentencing guidelines system requires defense attorneys to challenge every offense variable (OV) and prior record variable (PRV) the prosecution scores — a single incorrectly scored variable can shift the recommended minimum sentence by years. Raiser & Kenniff has defended clients facing first-degree murder charges in Wayne County Circuit Court, challenged habitual offender enhancements in Oakland County, represented defendants in federal drug conspiracy cases in the Eastern District of Michigan, and secured acquittals in firearms possession cases where search and seizure issues under Article 1, Section 11 of the Michigan Constitution provided grounds for suppression.
Pros
- Former Manhattan prosecutors bring insider knowledge of how the state builds its case
- Handle the full spectrum of criminal charges from misdemeanors to federal RICO indictments
- Four New York offices with 24/7 emergency arrest response
- AV Preeminent rated with a documented track record of acquittals and dismissals
Cons
- Primary offices concentrated in New York — remote representation for out-of-state clients
- Premium pricing reflects the caliber of former-prosecutor defense
2. The Cochran Firm
Min. Business Debt
No minimum
Avg. Fees
Case-dependent
Resolution Timeline
Varies by charge
The Cochran Firm earns the #2 spot for Michigan with their extensive local presence and experience across every major Michigan court. Their Detroit-area attorneys handle the full spectrum of criminal cases in Wayne County Circuit Court and the 36th District Court, from carjacking and home invasion to drug manufacturing and armed robbery. The Cochran Firm's deep bench is particularly valuable in Michigan because the state's habitual offender statute allows prosecutors to seek dramatically enhanced sentences for repeat offenders — effective defense requires the resources to investigate every prior conviction for validity and challenge any that were obtained without proper counsel or procedure.
Pros
- 40+ offices across the United States provide genuine local presence in most major metros
- Founded by Johnnie Cochran — the firm carries a legacy of landmark criminal defense victories
- Handles everything from DUI and drug charges to homicide and federal white-collar cases
- Deep bench of attorneys allows complex cases to receive multi-lawyer attention
Cons
- Quality of representation can vary between independently operated regional offices
- High-profile brand means higher fee expectations in some markets
3. Spodek Law Group
Min. Business Debt
No minimum
Avg. Fees
Consultation-based
Resolution Timeline
Varies by charge
Spodek Law Group ranks #3 for Michigan with their federal criminal defense expertise in the Eastern and Western Districts of Michigan. The Eastern District (Detroit) is one of the busiest federal courts in the country for drug trafficking, healthcare fraud, and public corruption cases, and Spodek's aggressive litigation approach is well suited to the high-stakes federal criminal environment. They have defended clients facing multi-count federal indictments involving RICO charges connected to Detroit-area organized crime, healthcare fraud schemes at Michigan medical facilities, and cross-border drug trafficking cases along the Michigan-Canada corridor.
Pros
- Aggressive litigation strategy built for high-stakes federal criminal defense
- NYC headquarters with direct access to federal courts in the Southern and Eastern Districts
- Experience defending complex financial crimes, fraud, and conspiracy charges
- Rapid-response team for emergency arraignments, bail hearings, and grand jury matters
Cons
- Federal case focus means less emphasis on routine state misdemeanor matters
- Primarily serves the NYC metro area for in-person representation
4. Varghese Summersett
Min. Business Debt
No minimum
Avg. Fees
Case-dependent
Resolution Timeline
Varies by charge
Varghese Summersett rounds out our Michigan top four with their unmatched trial defense credentials. Michigan defendants facing trial in Wayne County Circuit Court or Oakland County Circuit Court benefit from Varghese Summersett's 700+ jury trial record and Board Certified criminal law specialists. Their former-prosecutor perspective is essential when navigating plea negotiations with the Wayne County Prosecutor's Office, which handles an enormous case volume and prioritizes efficient case resolution. For defendants who refuse to plead and insist on their constitutional right to trial, Varghese Summersett's courtroom experience is a significant asset.
Pros
- Four Board Certified Criminal Law Specialists — the highest designation in Texas criminal defense
- All partners are former state or federal prosecutors who know how the other side operates
- 1,600+ case dismissals and 700+ jury trials give the firm unmatched courtroom experience
- Offices in Fort Worth, Dallas, Houston, and Southlake covering all major Texas metros
Cons
- Offices are Texas-based — out-of-state clients require remote coordination
- High demand means new client intake may have wait times for non-emergency matters
Michigan Criminal Defense Lawyers Compared
| Provider | Min. Debt | Avg. Fees | Timeline | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Raiser & Kenniff
Top Pick
|
No minimum | Case-dependent | Varies by charge |
4.9
|
|
The Cochran Firm
|
No minimum | Case-dependent | Varies by charge |
4.8
|
|
Spodek Law Group
|
No minimum | Consultation-based | Varies by charge |
4.8
|
|
Varghese Summersett
|
No minimum | Case-dependent | Varies by charge |
4.7
|
Criminal Defense in Michigan: The Complete 2026 Legal Guide
Michigan's criminal justice system combines a progressive history — it was the first English-speaking government to abolish the death penalty — with a modern sentencing framework that can impose severe penalties for serious and repeat offenders. Understanding Michigan's sentencing guidelines, habitual offender statute, and the advisory-but-influential role of the guidelines after People v. Lockridge is essential for effective criminal defense.
Michigan Criminal Law Framework
Michigan criminal law is codified in the Michigan Compiled Laws (MCL), with criminal offenses primarily found in Chapters 750 (Michigan Penal Code) and 333 (Public Health Code for drug offenses). Felonies are classified from Class A (most serious, including first-degree murder carrying mandatory life without parole) through Class H (least serious felonies, typically carrying a maximum of 2 years). The Michigan Sentencing Guidelines (MCL 777.1 et seq.) calculate a recommended minimum sentence range based on offense variables and prior record variables. After People v. Lockridge (2015), the guidelines are advisory rather than mandatory, but Michigan judges must still consult them and provide reasons for departures. The State Bar of Michigan regulates attorney conduct through the Attorney Discipline Board and the Attorney Grievance Commission.
Common Criminal Charges in Michigan
Drug offenses represent the largest category of criminal cases in Michigan. The state's proximity to the Canadian border and its position along major interstate corridors (I-75, I-94, I-96) make it a significant drug trafficking route. Delivery and manufacture of controlled substances (MCL 333.7401) carries penalties ranging from 4 years to life imprisonment depending on the substance and quantity. Firearms charges are heavily prosecuted in Michigan, with the felony-firearm statute (MCL 750.227b) imposing a mandatory consecutive 2-year sentence for possessing a firearm during the commission of a felony. Assault charges, including domestic violence (MCL 750.81), represent a large portion of district court cases. Carjacking (MCL 750.529a) and home invasion (MCL 750.110a) are among the most seriously charged property crimes, carrying up to life imprisonment and 20 years respectively.
Choosing a Criminal Defense Lawyer in Michigan
Michigan defendants should seek attorneys with specific experience in the court where their case is pending. Wayne County Circuit Court, Oakland County Circuit Court, and Kent County Circuit Court each have distinct judicial cultures. An attorney who understands the scoring of offense variables and prior record variables under the sentencing guidelines can identify errors that shift the recommended minimum sentence range — this is often the most impactful defense work in Michigan. Verify that your attorney is in good standing with the State Bar of Michigan and has no pending grievances with the Attorney Grievance Commission.
Alternative Dispositions in Michigan
- Holmes Youthful Trainee Act (HYTA): Michigan's HYTA (MCL 762.11–762.14) allows defendants aged 17–23 to have certain criminal convictions set aside upon successful completion of probation. HYTA status keeps the conviction off the public record, which can be critical for young defendants facing employment and educational consequences. Not all offenses are HYTA-eligible, and the decision is within the judge's discretion.
- 7411 Deferral for Drug Offenses: Under MCL 333.7411, first-time drug possession offenders may receive a deferred sentence. If the defendant successfully completes probation, the charge is dismissed and the record can be sealed. This is one of the most powerful alternative dispositions available in Michigan and is routinely sought by defense attorneys for eligible clients.
- Drug Courts and Sobriety Courts: Michigan operates drug treatment courts in most counties, including Wayne, Oakland, Kent, and Washtenaw. These courts provide intensive supervision, substance abuse treatment, and graduated sanctions as an alternative to incarceration. Sobriety courts specifically handle repeat OUI offenders and have demonstrated reduced recidivism rates.
- Expungement under Clean Slate Act: Michigan's Clean Slate Act (2020) expanded expungement eligibility and created an automatic expungement process for certain misdemeanors after 7 years and certain felonies after 10 years. Individuals can also petition for expungement of up to 3 felonies and unlimited misdemeanors. This landmark legislation gives Michigan one of the most expansive expungement programs in the country.
Michigan Sentencing Guidelines: Advisory but Influential
Before 2015, Michigan's sentencing guidelines were mandatory — judges were required to sentence within the calculated range or face appellate reversal. The Michigan Supreme Court's decision in People v. Lockridge changed that, ruling that mandatory guidelines violated the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court in United States v. Booker.
Post-Lockridge, the guidelines are advisory. Judges must still calculate and consider them, but they may depart from the recommended range if they articulate substantial and compelling reasons. In practice, however, most Michigan judges sentence within or very close to the guidelines range. This means that defense work on the guidelines calculation — challenging offense variable scoring, disputing prior record variables, and presenting mitigating evidence — remains the most consequential phase of many Michigan criminal cases.
Each offense variable (OV) captures a specific aggravating factor: OV 1 scores aggravated use of a weapon, OV 3 scores physical injury to a victim, OV 4 scores psychological injury. Prior record variables (PRVs) account for the defendant's criminal history. An error in any single variable can shift the minimum sentence range by months or years. Experienced Michigan defense attorneys audit every variable the prosecution scores and file objections before sentencing.
The sentencing guidelines may be advisory, but they are the gravity around which every Michigan sentence orbits. Defense attorneys who ignore the guidelines calculation do so at their clients' peril.
The Habitual Offender Statute: Michigan's Sentencing Multiplier
Michigan's habitual offender statute (MCL 769.10–769.13) allows prosecutors to seek dramatically enhanced sentences for defendants with prior felony convictions. The enhancements are tiered: a second habitual offender faces a maximum sentence of 1.5 times the statutory maximum for the current offense; a third habitual offender faces double the maximum; and a fourth habitual offender faces up to life imprisonment regardless of the underlying charge.
This means a defendant charged with a Class E felony (normally carrying a maximum of 5 years) could face up to life in prison if the prosecution proves three or more prior felony convictions. The habitual offender notice is a charging tool prosecutors use strategically — it creates enormous leverage in plea negotiations because defendants face catastrophic sentencing exposure if they go to trial and lose.
Effective defense against habitual offender enhancements requires attorneys to scrutinize every prior conviction. Were the prior pleas entered with valid counsel? Did the defendant understand the rights being waived? Were the underlying offenses actually felonies under Michigan law at the time they were committed? A prior conviction that was obtained in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights cannot be used for habitual offender enhancement, and skilled defense attorneys regularly challenge prior convictions on these grounds.
How We Ranked Michigan Criminal Defense Lawyers Companies
We spent 150 hours evaluating criminal defense attorneys and firms serving Michigan. We assessed courtroom track records in Wayne, Oakland, and Kent County circuit courts, reviewed federal defense outcomes in the Eastern and Western Districts of Michigan, verified standing with the State Bar of Michigan, and analyzed each firm's experience with sentencing guidelines challenges and habitual offender defense.
Courtroom Track Record
30%We evaluated each firm's history of acquittals, dismissals, charge reductions, and favorable plea outcomes across felony, misdemeanor, and federal cases. Firms with documented trial wins received the highest marks.
Attorney Credentials & Experience
25%We assessed bar standing, board certifications, former prosecutor experience, years of practice, and whether attorneys hold leadership positions in criminal defense bar associations.
Client Reviews & Reputation
25%We analyzed client reviews on Avvo, Google, Martindale-Hubbell, and state bar records. We also reviewed any disciplinary history, peer endorsements, and Super Lawyers or Best Lawyers recognitions.
Accessibility & Client Service
20%We evaluated 24/7 availability for arrests, response time to initial inquiries, fee transparency, geographic reach, language capabilities, and whether the firm offers free initial consultations.
Michigan Criminal Defense Lawyers FAQ
David Marquand
Senior Criminal Justice Editor
David Marquand is a former criminal courts reporter and senior legal editor at Zogby with over 12 years of experience covering criminal defense, sentencing reform, and constitutional law. He holds a J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center and has been published in The National Law Journal, The Crime Report, and The Marshall Project.
More Criminal Defense Lawyers Guides Near Michigan
Best Criminal Defense Lawyers in Ohio
Compare top criminal defense firms serving Ohio defendants.
Best Criminal Defense Lawyers in Indiana
Review our rankings for Indiana criminal defense.
Best Criminal Defense Lawyers in Illinois
See our guide for defendants facing charges in Illinois.
Best Criminal Defense Lawyers in Wisconsin
Explore criminal defense options in Wisconsin.
Important Legal Disclaimers
- This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. If you are facing criminal charges, consult a qualified criminal defense attorney in your jurisdiction immediately.
- Results vary by case. Past case results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every criminal case is unique and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, jurisdiction, and applicable law.
- Attorney fees vary by firm, case complexity, charge severity, and geographic location. Always obtain a written fee agreement and understand all costs before engaging any law firm.
- Being charged with a crime does not mean you are guilty. You have the constitutional right to an attorney and to be presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
- Time is critical in criminal cases. Statutes of limitations, evidence preservation, and pre-charge intervention opportunities may be affected by delay.
- Zogby does not provide legal services. We are an independent comparison service that connects individuals with criminal defense attorneys. We may receive compensation from featured firms.
The information provided on this page is for general informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice and should not be relied upon as a substitute for consultation with a qualified criminal defense attorney licensed in your state.
Editorial Independence
We make money from some companies on this page. That doesn't change our rankings -- the editorial team scores every product independently, and the business side has no say in what we recommend.