Skip to content
2026 Washington Rankings

Washington classifies felonies into Classes A, B, and C under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981, with no death penalty following the state Supreme Court’s 2018 ruling in State v. Gregory. We ranked the top criminal defense firms for Washington residents facing charges in King County (Seattle), Pierce County (Tacoma), and courts statewide.

Best Criminal Defense Lawyers in Washington (2026)

DM
David Marquand
Updated
BBB Accredited
Free Consultation
No Upfront Fees
Licensed & Bonded
4 Companies Reviewed
Quick Answer

Raiser & Kenniff

4.9/5 Best Overall

Our top-rated pick for reliability, customer service, and proven results.

Zogby is an independent, advertising-supported comparison service. We may receive compensation from the companies whose products appear on this site. This compensation may impact how, where, and in what order products appear. Zogby does not include every financial company or every product available in the marketplace.

The best Criminal Defense Lawyers company in Washington for 2026 is Raiser & Kenniff, rated 4.9 with fees of Case-dependent and a resolution timeline of Varies by charge. Other top-rated options include The Cochran Firm (rated 4.8) and Spodek Law Group (rated 4.8).

Top Pick
Raiser & Kenniff
Rating
4.9
Avg. Fees
Case-dependent

Last updated

Key Takeaways: Criminal Defense Lawyers in Washington

  • 1 Raiser & Kenniff is our #1-ranked criminal defense firm for Washington in 2026 — their former-prosecutor backgrounds and aggressive defense approach are well-suited to Washington’s evolving criminal justice landscape.
  • 2 Washington has no death penalty following the state Supreme Court’s 2018 ruling in State v. Gregory, which found the sentence was imposed in an arbitrary and racially biased manner.
  • 3 The Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 establishes a sentencing grid where the standard range depends on the offense seriousness level (I–XVI) and the offender score (prior convictions), making the grid calculation a critical component of defense strategy.
  • 4 The 2021 Blake decision (State v. Blake) invalidated Washington’s simple drug possession statute, and subsequent legislative fixes have created ongoing uncertainty about how drug cases are charged and prosecuted.
  • 5 Federal cases in the Western District (Seattle, Tacoma) and Eastern District (Spokane, Yakima, Richland) frequently involve drug trafficking, immigration, and fraud.
Top Pick
Raiser & Kenniff
4.9

Washington State’s criminal justice system has undergone dramatic changes in recent years. The state Supreme Court struck down the death penalty as unconstitutional in 2018 (State v. Gregory), the landmark Blake decision in 2021 temporarily invalidated the state’s drug possession statute, and subsequent legislative reforms have reshaped drug policy, sentencing, and policing across the state. Washington classifies felonies into Classes A (life maximum), B (up to 10 years), and C (up to 5 years), and its Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 establishes a structured sentencing grid that determines standard ranges based on offense severity and criminal history.

King County (Seattle) processes the largest volume of criminal cases in the state, but defendants across Washington — from Spokane to Vancouver to the Tri-Cities — face prosecutors who leverage the state’s sentencing grid aggressively. The firms ranked below have the trial experience and knowledge of Washington’s evolving legal landscape to provide effective defense in this dynamic environment.

Best Overall
Raiser & Kenniff logo

Rank 1: Raiser & Kenniff

4.9
Editor's Rating

Raiser & Kenniff leads our Washington rankings because their former-prosecutor backgrounds provide an essential advantage in a state where the legal landscape is shifting rapidly. Washington’s post-Blake reforms, evolving drug policy, and sentencing grid calculations create complexity that requires attorneys with deep prosecution experience to navigate effectively. Their AV Preeminent rating and documented track record of acquittals and dismissals make them the top choice for defendants in King County Superior Court, Pierce County Superior Court, and Washington courts statewide.

Show Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Former Manhattan prosecutors bring insider knowledge of how the state builds its case
  • Handle the full spectrum of criminal charges from misdemeanors to federal RICO indictments
  • Four New York offices with 24/7 emergency arrest response
  • AV Preeminent rated with a documented track record of acquittals and dismissals

Cons

  • Primary offices concentrated in New York — remote representation for out-of-state clients
  • Premium pricing reflects the caliber of former-prosecutor defense
Min. Business Debt: No minimum Avg. Fees: Case-dependent Resolution Timeline: Varies by charge
Best Nationwide Coverage
The Cochran Firm logo

Rank 2: The Cochran Firm

4.8
Min. Debt
No minimum
Fees
Case-dependent
Timeline
Varies by charge
Get a Free Consultation
Best for Federal Cases
Spodek Law Group logo

Rank 3: Spodek Law Group

4.8
Min. Debt
No minimum
Fees
Consultation-based
Timeline
Varies by charge
Get a Free Consultation
Best for Trial Defense
Varghese Summersett logo

Rank 4: Varghese Summersett

4.7
Min. Debt
No minimum
Fees
Case-dependent
Timeline
Varies by charge
Get a Free Consultation

Washington Criminal Defense Lawyers Compared

Washington Criminal Defense Lawyers companies compared by minimum debt, fees, timeline, and rating
Metric Raiser & Kenniff Top Pick The Cochran Firm Spodek Law Group Varghese Summersett
Min. Debt No minimum No minimum No minimum No minimum
Avg. Fees Case-dependent Case-dependent Consultation-based Case-dependent
Timeline Varies by charge Varies by charge Varies by charge Varies by charge
Rating
4.9
4.8
4.8
4.7

Multi-Factor Comparison

RatingFee ValueSpeed

Raiser & Kenniff across rating, fees, and speed

Economic Snapshot

Source: Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED). Indicators refresh daily.

CFPB Complaint Tracker

Last 12 months · Apr 11, 2026
51,309
Complaints Filed
99%
Timely Response
27,859
Incorrect information on your report
8,852
Improper use of your report
Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem 5,927
Written notification about debt 1,479

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. All financial complaints filed from WA in the past 12 months.

1How Washington Classifies Criminal Offenses

Washington classifies felonies into three classes under RCW 9A.20.021. Class A felonies carry a maximum of life imprisonment and a $50,000 fine, and include first-degree murder, rape in the first degree, and first-degree kidnapping. Class B felonies carry up to 10 years and a $20,000 fine, and include second-degree assault, residential burglary, and vehicular homicide. Class C felonies carry up to 5 years and a $10,000 fine, and include third-degree assault, theft in the first degree, and drug distribution. However, the actual sentence is determined by the Sentencing Reform Act grid, which cross-references the offense seriousness level (I through XVI) with the offender score (calculated from prior convictions). The resulting standard range is presumptive, and departures require specific findings. Understanding the grid — and how to challenge offender score calculations — is one of the most impactful things a defense attorney can do.

2Alternatives to Trial for Criminal Cases in Washington

  • Deferred Prosecution: Under RCW 10.05, defendants charged with certain misdemeanors (particularly DUI) may petition for deferred prosecution, which involves completing a two-year treatment program. If successful, the charges are dismissed. This option is available only once in a lifetime and requires a finding that the defendant suffers from alcoholism, drug addiction, or mental health issues that contributed to the offense.
  • Stipulated Order of Continuance (SOC): Many Washington courts allow stipulated orders of continuance, where the defendant agrees to meet certain conditions (community service, treatment, no new offenses) over a period of time. If all conditions are met, the charges are dismissed. SOCs are commonly used for first-time, non-violent offenses and provide an effective path to avoiding a criminal record.
  • Drug Courts: Washington operates drug courts in most counties under RCW 2.30. These specialty courts provide treatment-based supervision for defendants with substance abuse disorders. Completion of the program, which typically lasts 12 to 18 months, can result in charge reduction or dismissal. King County’s drug court is one of the oldest and most established in the nation.
  • Sentencing Alternatives: The Sentencing Reform Act provides several alternatives for eligible defendants, including the Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA, RCW 9.94A.660), the First-Time Offender Waiver (RCW 9.94A.650), and the Family & Offender Sentencing Alternative (FOSA). Each provides a path to shorter sentences, community supervision, or treatment in lieu of incarceration.

3DUI Defense in Washington

Washington DUI law (RCW 46.61.502) imposes escalating penalties. A first DUI carries 1 to 364 days in jail (mandatory minimum 1 day for BAC 0.08–0.14, 2 days for BAC 0.15+), a $350 to $5,000 fine, and a 90-day license suspension. A second DUI within 7 years carries 30 to 364 days in jail (mandatory minimum 30 days for BAC under 0.15, 45 days for 0.15+) and a two-year license revocation. A third DUI within 10 years is elevated from a gross misdemeanor to a Class C felony under HB 1353, carrying up to 5 years in prison. Washington also allows DUI charges based on THC impairment (5 ng/mL threshold), reflecting the state’s legalization of recreational cannabis.

4The Sentencing Reform Act Grid

Washington’s Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (RCW 9.94A) replaced judicial discretion with a structured sentencing grid. Each felony is assigned a seriousness level (I through XVI), and each defendant receives an offender score based on prior convictions. The intersection of seriousness level and offender score produces a standard sentencing range that is presumptive — judges can depart from the range only by making specific factual findings. Defense attorneys who can successfully challenge offender score calculations (by arguing that prior convictions should not count, were improperly scored, or have washed out) can shift the sentencing range dramatically. For example, reducing an offender score from 3 to 2 on a seriousness level VI offense can reduce the standard range by several months to years.

5Impact of State v. Blake on Criminal Defense

The Blake decision’s impact extends far beyond drug possession cases. Thousands of prior drug possession convictions have been vacated, and those vacated convictions no longer count toward offender scores under the sentencing grid. This means that defendants currently facing charges may have lower offender scores than prosecutors initially calculated, resulting in shorter standard ranges. Defense attorneys who identify Blake-eligible prior convictions and move to vacate them can achieve significant sentencing reductions for their clients — even in cases that have nothing to do with drug possession. This downstream effect makes Blake one of the most consequential criminal defense tools in Washington.

6Criminal Defense in Washington: What Defendants Need to Know

Washington’s criminal justice system is in a period of significant transition. The abolition of the death penalty, the Blake decision’s impact on drug possession law, police accountability reforms, and ongoing sentencing reform debates have created an environment where the law is changing faster than many practitioners can keep up. Understanding the current state of Washington criminal law — and where it is heading — is essential for effective defense.

7The Blake Decision and Drug Policy Reform

In February 2021, the Washington Supreme Court issued State v. Blake, which struck down the state’s simple drug possession statute (RCW 69.50.4013) as unconstitutional because it did not require proof of knowledge or intent. The decision created immediate chaos: thousands of past convictions were vacated, current cases were dismissed, and prosecutors temporarily lost the ability to charge simple possession. The Legislature responded with a series of temporary fixes, ultimately enacting a revised possession statute that made simple possession a gross misdemeanor (rather than a felony) and emphasized treatment over incarceration. The ongoing evolution of drug policy in Washington means that defense attorneys must stay current on statutory changes, court rulings interpreting the new law, and local prosecution policies that vary significantly across counties.

How We Ranked Washington Criminal Defense Lawyers Companies

1

Courtroom Track Record

30%

We evaluated each firm's history of acquittals, dismissals, charge reductions, and favorable plea outcomes across felony, misdemeanor, and federal cases. Firms with documented trial wins received the highest marks.

2

Attorney Credentials & Experience

25%

We assessed bar standing, board certifications, former prosecutor experience, years of practice, and whether attorneys hold leadership positions in criminal defense bar associations.

3

Client Reviews & Reputation

25%

We analyzed client reviews on Avvo, Google, Martindale-Hubbell, and state bar records. We also reviewed any disciplinary history, peer endorsements, and Super Lawyers or Best Lawyers recognitions.

4

Accessibility & Client Service

20%

We evaluated 24/7 availability for arrests, response time to initial inquiries, fee transparency, geographic reach, language capabilities, and whether the firm offers free initial consultations.

50+ Law Firms Evaluated 200+ Hours of Research 30+ Sources Cited

We spent 200 hours evaluating criminal defense attorneys and firms serving Washington State. We assessed each firm’s trial record in Washington superior courts and both federal districts, reviewed acquittal and dismissal rates, verified bar standing with the Washington State Bar Association, and interviewed Washington defendants who retained their services.

Washington Criminal Defense Lawyers FAQ

Who is the best criminal defense lawyer in Washington for 2026?
Raiser & Kenniff is our #1-ranked criminal defense firm for Washington in 2026. Their former-prosecutor experience and aggressive defense strategy are well-suited to Washington’s evolving legal landscape. The Cochran Firm (#2) provides strong Pacific Northwest coverage with experienced attorneys across the state.
Does Washington have the death penalty?
No. The Washington Supreme Court struck down the death penalty in 2018 in State v. Gregory, finding it was imposed in an arbitrary and racially biased manner. The maximum sentence for the most serious offenses is now life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.
How did the Blake decision affect drug charges in Washington?
The 2021 Blake decision (State v. Blake) struck down Washington’s drug possession statute as unconstitutional. The Legislature enacted a revised law making simple possession a gross misdemeanor (not a felony) with an emphasis on treatment referrals. Thousands of prior convictions were vacated, and those vacated convictions no longer count toward offender scores in the sentencing grid — benefiting defendants in cases beyond just drug possession.
What is the sentencing grid in Washington?
Washington’s Sentencing Reform Act uses a grid that cross-references offense seriousness level (I–XVI) with offender score (based on prior convictions) to produce a standard sentencing range. Judges must sentence within this range unless they make specific findings justifying a departure. The grid makes offender score calculations and seriousness level challenges among the most impactful defense strategies.
What is deferred prosecution in Washington?
Deferred prosecution (RCW 10.05) is a one-time option for defendants charged with certain misdemeanors, particularly DUI. The defendant must demonstrate alcoholism, drug addiction, or mental health issues and complete a two-year treatment program. If successful, the charges are dismissed. It is available only once in a lifetime and requires a genuine commitment to treatment.

Washington Attorney General

AG Brown continues to combat illegal tire-dumping harming salmon populations

AG Brown continues to combat illegal tire-dumping harming salmon populations FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Apr 8 2026 atgSamBlobaum Wed, 04/08/2026 - 11:22 Two individuals were scheduled for arraignment Wednesday in Thurston County District Court after the Washington State Attorney General’s Office charged them with allegedly dumping more than a thousand tires in Capitol State Forest. Tires contain a chemical that can be lethal to salmon, making tire-dumping a unique threat to Washington’s natural resources. This criminal case is the latest in a series of efforts from the AG’s office to combat illegal tire dumping in Washington state.

Washington State - Office of the Attorney General · Apr 8, 2026
AG Brown opposes Northwest Natural Gas Company’s steep rate hikes

AG Brown opposes Northwest Natural Gas Company’s steep rate hikes FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Apr 7 2026 atgSamBlobaum Tue, 04/07/2026 - 12:53 On Friday, the Washington State Attorney General’s Office challenged Northwest Natural Gas Company’s (NW Natural) proposed rate increases and urged the Utilities & Transportation Commission (UTC) to reject a settlement agreement that would allow steep rate increases to go forward. NW Natural is a private, for-profit utility company which the state has licensed to operate as a monopoly in southwest Washington.

Washington State - Office of the Attorney General · Apr 7, 2026
CONSUMER ALERT: Investment scams proliferate on Meta platforms Washington State - Office of the Attorney General · Apr 6, 2026

About the Author

DM

David Marquand

Senior Criminal Justice Editor
J.D., Georgetown Law 12+ Years Experience NACDL Member

Estimate Your Savings

Use our free calculators to estimate your potential savings and find the best path to financial relief.

Try the Calculator

Important Legal Disclaimers

  • This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. If you are facing criminal charges, consult a qualified criminal defense attorney in your jurisdiction immediately.
  • Results vary by case. Past case results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every criminal case is unique and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, jurisdiction, and applicable law.
  • Attorney fees vary by firm, case complexity, charge severity, and geographic location. Always obtain a written fee agreement and understand all costs before engaging any law firm.
  • Being charged with a crime does not mean you are guilty. You have the constitutional right to an attorney and to be presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • Time is critical in criminal cases. Statutes of limitations, evidence preservation, and pre-charge intervention opportunities may be affected by delay.
  • Zogby does not provide legal services. We are an independent comparison service that connects individuals with criminal defense attorneys. We may receive compensation from featured firms.

The information provided on this page is for general informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice and should not be relied upon as a substitute for consultation with a qualified criminal defense attorney licensed in your state.

Editorial Independence

We make money from some companies on this page. That doesn't change our rankings -- the editorial team scores every product independently, and the business side has no say in what we recommend.

Last Updated
Fact-Checked
March 16, 2026