Archive

Posts Tagged ‘white house’

Is Obama Abandoning Progressive Causes?

November 4th, 2009

One-Third of 18-24 Year Olds: Obama Is Abandoning Progressive Causes

By Alexander Heffner / November 4th, 2009

 

As important as the youth demographic was in electing Barack Obama to the White House, it seems young Americans have lost faith in the president’s political motives.

According to a new ScoopDaily/Zogby poll, 30% of Americans between the ages of 18 and 24 believe that President Obama is “abandoning many of the progressive causes he championed during his campaign.” In addition, only 44% of 18- to 24-year-olds firmly believe he is still “working as hard as he can to fulfill” those same progressive causes.

Is President Obama abandoning liberal principles he heralded during the campaign? Compared to a slimmer averaged 20% across the older demographics, 18 to 24 year-olds say yes.

Overall, only slightly more than half (54%) of Americans view Obama as sticking to his campaign goals.

Minorities seem to give the first black president the benefit of the doubt more often. African-American (74%), Asian (60%) and Jewish (64%) citizens all believe in Obama’s work toward progressive causes significantly more than white or Christian Americans. Hispanics (53%) are the only minority who isn’t as confident.

Ideological inclinations provide little surprise, as liberals backed Obama and conservatives showed less faith. Conservatives and moderates agreed at the same rate (23%) about abandonment, but twice as many conservatives answered neither yes nor no, perhaps because a ‘yes’ would nullify their dislike for his policies while ‘no’ would give him credit for accomplishing the change he promised.

“I think that growing disillusionment with Obama is not a surprise. In the first year of his presidency, he does not have a winning record toward meeting the promises he’s made,” responded Mary Jane O’Malley, a 2009 graduate of the University of Colorado and a Tulsa Corps Teach for America volunteer.

However, O’Malley notes that the that notion of abandonment is likely “premature.”

Gillian Evans, a sophomore Georgetown University, is among the most troubled about Obama’s presidency on the anniversary of his election.

“Not that the alternative candidate provided much to chose from, and I don’t blame young Americans for overwhelmingly supporting Obama,” she concedes.

“But I do think that their expectations were astronomical and unfounded,” Evans says, “and most Americans who were swept up in Obama fever believed that all Americans were behind Obama.”

Adelaide Elm Kimball, a board member of Vote Smart, the nonpartisan electoral outreach organization, cited “the post-election hard realities of the national economy” as deeply entrenched problems that will not be resolved overnight.

“The disservice that…both major parties do the public is lead them to expect that solutions can be quickly found for our enormous problems,” continued Kimball, “Young people are no different than the rest of us in that respect.”

Matt Bai, a senior writer for The New York Times Magazine who has examined President Obama as well as former President Clinton’s centrist political persona and triangulation, warns young Americans that “Centrists always disappoint, and Obama is a centrist.”

Still, he adds, “Obama as a sellout seems like a pretty tough case to make, given the record, but younger voters have less context and more fervor.”

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Steph Uncategorized , , , , , ,

Younger Americans Embrace Obama-Style Diplomacy

August 6th, 2009

By Alexander Heffner

Country generally split on Obama’s international worldview and domestic spending.

As former President Bill Clinton undertook a White House-sanctioned humanitarian mission to North Korea and successfully secured the release of two imprisoned American journalists, a new Zogby-Scoop44 interactive poll shows that a majority young Americans — and nearly half of all respondents polled — favor President Obama’s new style of diplomacy, a worldview that encouraged the former President’s private trip to Pyongyang.

Clinton’s visit with President Kim Jong-il of North Korea ended the 140 day saga, ensured the two Current TV journalists’ freedom, and signaled the opening of possible diplomatic channels with the rogue regime and its globally estranged leader.

According to the Zogby-Scoop44 poll, about 55% of Americans between 18 and 29 said they agreed with Obama’s emerging foreign policy doctrine. A similar 50% majority from 30 to 49 also approved of the President’s diplomatic streak.

However, respondents older than 50 reflected their unease with Obama’s worldview: a majority, 52%, in the 50-64 and 65+ brackets say they disagree with his approach.

Among all respondents, 48.5% said they agree with the new presidential diplomatic measures, while nearly 47% said they disagree.

A sharp age fissure exists between the younger and older demographic—both on this question and on Americans’ assessment of economic stimulus and other spending programs—suggesting a generational barrier President Obama, 48, still struggles to overcome.

Most likely voters (53%) believe President Obama’s economic policies will translate into debt for future generations—a term coined “generational theft” by Senator John McCain.

Younger voters, however, are likelier to view spending initiatives in health care, education, and other areas as investment in America’s future welfare – 47% of those age 18-29 feel this way, compared to just 32% of those age 65 or older.

On the spending vote, respondents generally followed party lines. While Republicans (94%) and conservatives (96%) overwhelmingly believe those polices equal debt for future generations of Americans, Democrats (72%) and liberals (83%) largely view Obama’s economic policies as necessary investment.

Sixty percent of self-described political independents believe Obama’s policies are leading to debt, while just 28% think they are an investment. Moderate voters are evenly split at 43%.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Leann Uncategorized , , , , , , , ,

Top Question Tuesday 6/30/09

June 30th, 2009

Welcome to this week’s edition of Top Question Tuesday. Last week’s winning question asked whether the Obama administration should be required to reveal the names of White House visitors.We’ll put this question on an upcoming interactive survey and blog about the results soon.

This week’s user-submitted survey questions are below. The questions are shortened to save space on our blog post, but these are the basic ideas. Take a look though and then vote for which question you’d most like to see on the next Zogby Interactive survey. As a reminder, if you’d like to submit a question to be considered for a Zogby survey, use the “contact us” box on the right of the page. And if you’d like to join Zogby’s interactive panel to answer questions similar to these, click here.

1. When deciding what groceries to purchase, which factor plays a larger role: the price of the groceries or the brand name of the groceries?

2. What type of news do you pay most attention to: local news, national news, international news, or do you not pay attention to any kind of news?

3. In America today, do you believe it is still possible to make a good living with a high school diploma only, or do you believe it is possible to make a good living only with education or training beyond a high school diploma?

Top Question Tuesday 6/30

  • Groceries (22%, 55 Votes)
  • Type of news (48%, 117 Votes)
  • High school diploma (30%, 73 Votes)

Total Voters: 245

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Katy methodology , , , , ,

Top Question Tuesday 6/16/09

June 16th, 2009

Welcome to this week’s edition of Top Question Tuesday. Last week’s winning question asked whether Supreme Court justices should continue to be appointed for life or whether they should serve for specified periods of time. We’ll put this question on an upcoming interactive survey and blog about the results soon.

This week’s user-submitted survey questions are below. The questions are shortened to save space on our blog post, but these are the basic ideas. Take a look though and then vote for which question you’d most like to see on the next Zogby Interactive survey. As a reminder, if you’d like to submit a question to be considered for a Zogby survey, use the “contact us” box on the right of the page. And if you’d like to join Zogby’s interactive panel to answer questions similar to these, click here.

1. Do you think the Obama administration should be required to reveal White House visitors?

2.  Do you think celebrities should be encouraged or not encouraged to adopt children from all over the world?

3. Do you believe Twitter will still exist in five years?

Top Question Tuesday 6/16

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Katy methodology , , , , ,

Why Is Single Payer Taboo?

March 12th, 2009

While nearly the entire Western world has national single-payer health care, that idea doesn’t seem to even be on the table for discussion here.
A Bloomberg.com columnist has noticed, and asks the same question. John F. Wasik, co-author of “iMoney,” is that Bloomberg News columnist. Here is what he wrote on March 11.

If President Barack Obama wants real change in American health care, he will have to get over the fear of even mentioning single-payer concepts. At his health-care summit last week, only the threat of a demonstration garnered late invitations for Oliver Fein and Congressman John Conyers, two leading proponents of the single-payer plan.

Obama has said he would keep an open mind on health-care solutions. Yet when asked on March 5 about why he was against single-payer medicine, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs replied: “The president doesn’t believe that’s the best way to achieve the goal of cutting costs and increasing access.”

Read more…

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Paul Uncategorized , , , ,

Can the voice of the real economy get the markets moving?

February 19th, 2009

There was a time when a good grilling of company management by a research analyst or fund manager was sufficient grounds to justify an investment decision.  A new poll of investors from Zogby International and Vox Pop Investing ™ suggests that time is long gone.

The findings reveal that investors now value the views of “knowledgeable, family, friends and colleagues” (35%) more than financial news websites such as Bloomberg and Reuters (32%), and more than twice as much as financial print media, including the Financial Times (14%). In fact, we now value each other’s advice on investments second only to financial experts and investment professionals (54%). Like investing itself, it seems that expert opinion has also become democratised.

The tidal wave of optimism that swept President Barack Obama to the White House was not based on expert opinion alone. “Yes we can” was a clarion call to people power, not just in the US but the world over. The investment world would appear to be no different. In many sectors of the economy the model for success has fundamentally shifted from “manufacturer push” to “consumer pull.”

Read more…

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

ZogbyFeaturedContributor Uncategorized , , , , , , ,

Door to the White House closes on Vietnam Vets

February 14th, 2009

John McCain’s defeat in the Presidential election very likely closed out any possibility of a Vietnam veteran becoming President. He is, in fact, the third consecutive Vietnam vet to lose the Presidential election.

Al Gore served as an Army journalist in Vietnam, and John Kerry won a Purple Heart there commanding a swift boat. Both lost to George W. Bush, whose military service in the Air National Guard is perhaps best known for questions about whether his father’s influence helped him get in the Guard.

Bush and Bill Clinton are the only two members of the Baby Boom Vietnam generation to hold the White House. Clinton was assailed with charges of being a draft dodger during the 1992 campaign. Still, he defeated incumbent George H.W. Bush, who as a World War II Navy flier was shot down over the Pacific. Four years later, Clinton defeated Bob Dole, who suffered terrible wounds and life-long disabilities in World War II combat in Europe. Now comes the defeat of McCain, perhaps the politician most identified with Vietnam service due to his ordeal as a POW for five and a half years after being shot down in Vietnam.

So, in each of the past five Presidential elections, men who served in war zones of WWII or Vietnam has lost to someone who never had that experience.

In a Forbes.com column published in November 2008, John Zogby examined why Vietnam vets have been denied the White House. He cites Zogby International polling that found 53% of likely voters believed that a candidate’s military service was important in deciding their vote. However, in comparison to other wars of the past 60 years, Vietnam was held in the lowest regard as for its importance to security and success of the military.

Was Vietnam service a real factor in this election, or any of the previous four? Is it just a coincidence that no Vietnam vet will ever be commander-in-chief?

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Zeljka elections , , , , , , ,